Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Bogus outdated thinking (Score 1) 444

32 GB Intel SSD, and that would be more then enough for your average laptop

I work and play on my laptop. It's my only computer - a fact that makes my life easier. Here's my storage requirements on top of OS/apps:

  • Photos: 40GB
  • Music: 50GB
  • VMs: 100GB (work-related)
  • Client data (encrypted, but no personal data): 30GB
  • Video: 1,200GB

My laptop drive lets me carry everything but video without an external HD. Back at home, I have full-size external drives for the video and for backups. Let me know when 512GB SSDs cost less than a Burton Custom.

Comment Re:Bogus outdated thinking (Score 1) 444

When I built my storage server, the comparisons were things like "new car"... I instead spent $500 for five 1TB drives in a RAID-6 array.

What good is a new house and a new car if you can't enjoy them because you're worrying about your RAID rebuild times? Choose life: choose SSD!

Comment Re:Bogus outdated thinking (Score 3, Informative) 444

And name 3 people you know who run raid-5 on their personal PCs, and I'll show you 3 guys who can't afford an SSD drive.

Yeah, every time an article on storage catches my eye, I have to check laptop SSD prices. So far, each time I do this, for the cost of a drive the size I need, I could buy a new snowboard, or a laptop, bike, half a holiday, room full of beer... etc. I really want one, but so far I haven't been able to look at that list and say "I'd rather have an SSD!"

Comment Re:How about a 250GB IPod Classic?! (Score 1) 521

Apple ALREADY had a 160 GB IPod Classic. How about a 250GB?! Cause this is really stupid to remove it from the market and then bring it back again, because nobody wants the 120 GB. Of course they don't want the 120GB. As much as I like and respect Apple, this particular move just seems like a throwback to me.

As a 160GB owner, I sympathise with your point of view, but I'm sure it was a sound business decision on Apple's part. The classic is now the least popular iPod model, so they dropped the least popular flavour of their least popular model. Most people bought the 120, which also happens to be considerably thinner, lighter and feels less clumsy than the original 160. The new classic has the same physical characteristics as the 120, so it's better than my 160.

I only bought the 160 because I got fed up with running out of storage on my ipods; the biggest classic was a sledgehammer solution.

Slashdot Top Deals

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...