Comment Re:washed-out ineptitude (Score 1) 22
LOL You know what makes your comment hilarious? You have no idea what you're talking about, and you're completely wrong. Yes, there was an art style. Prior to 2010, there certainly were films with a washed out look or sepia feel, such as Oh, Brother Where Art Thou?, 2001. But when the new digital RAW format 4K professional video camera was released in 2007, followed by the 6K and 8K versions, no one could figure out why the footage was washed out. That's just the nature of RAW, and post-production didn't understand digital color timing or color correction. Beginning in 2010, there is a long series of national film and TV releases leading up to today that just used the color-uncorrected footage because, without understanding, they had no choice. X-Art releases are just one example, but the most notorious example is Shutter Island, 2010, so even major releases with top tier actors and directors were having the problem and hiding it with "artistic choice." Another is Drive, 2011, which has wonky colors and can't decide between sepia and saturated colors. Every time another studio switches to the RAW format, you see them release a bunch of "artist choice" releases. But that's bullshit. Google "RAW video format washed out." Everyone seems to have the problem when they are first introduced to RAW. After 13 years I would have expected X-Art to figure it out, but they never figured out digital color timing and color correction of their RAW footage, and all their release show no post-production.