Comment Re:tough encryption (Score 1) 71
Gee, a +13 shift. That was tough to crack.
Rotate, not shift.
Gee, a +13 shift. That was tough to crack.
Rotate, not shift.
http://www.kali.org/official-documentation/
It's a link on the top of the home page. I bet you couldn't find your arse with both hands and a mirror.
non-free porn ?
Why not xxx.[country_code] for porn? No need to add an extra level just for that.
I like the idea of a separate porn tld, makes it easy both for those who want to find it, and those who want to avoid it.
Try measuring its terminal velocity by dropping it off of a very tall building. Preferably, drop it on a building owned by Oracle.
FTFY
It could, but that would be wrong.
There's nothing in the standards that says the sending server has to be in the same domain as the mail client.
I can use a gmail server to send mail from a hotmail address, or my ISP's smtp server to send mail from my domain, which may not be big enough to justify it's own infrastructure.
Use OpenPGP, there's the Enigmail plugin for Thunderbird, and a plugin for Outlook. Pretty sure there'll be something for Mac.
Certainly Enigmail can be configured to automatically fetch other peoples public keys.
Actually stabbing someone is very easy. That is why in close quarters, a knife is far more dangerous than a gun.
Do you think so?
Having done neither, I'd always thought that stabbing somebody would be more difficult - having to be "up close and personal", rather than at a distance and somewhat removed from the consequences of the act, as with a shooting.
Doesn't matter, unless they roll out a new CA cert every week.
It's the longevity, and security, of the CA cert that matters.
Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.