Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The big brother society (Score 0) 178

Remember in "The Right Stuff", when the nurse was telling the astronauts that they had to provide a sperm sample for testing? There was no sane reason why NASA needed that information. They were just collecting it because they could. Because someone said, "well, we've got just about everything on these boys... did we miss anything?"

I was reminded of that scene not too long ago, when applying for a job in the... how shall I put this politely... "financial sector". And again just now, when I read this thing.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 170

Besides during this horrible economy, is it really sensible to spend so much money on such a project?

Maybe building this monstrosity is a good idea, maybe it isn't. But if you do decide to build it, then now is the perfect time. Real estate prices are low (compared to NYC 12 years ago, at least). Interest rates are low. And there's thousands of construction workers looking for jobs.

Comment Re:There's a reason for that. (Score 1) 633

Just because you CAN get high-quality beer at reasonable prices in this country doesn't mean that the majority of beer sold/consumed in this country is cheap crap.

You have it exactly backwards. I can get a wide selection of good beer at several places in my neighborhood, including one brewery. As long as the good stuff's available, why should I care what the majority drinks?

Comment Re:Politics (Score 1) 412

North Carolina banned state officials from taking global warming into account for the purpose of predicting shoreline erosion. (NC has a flat, sandy shore with a lot of barrier islands, so they need to pay attention to that stuff.) So they're not outlawing global warming, just pretending that it doesn't exist - which is equally stupid, but not quite the same thing.

Comment Re:Local IT control, _not_ Apple. (Score 1) 148

Exactly. Thanks for the summary. I'd tell people to read the damn article, but most of them can't read Polish, and the translation is gibberish.

The issue here is that the admins were keeping backups of the data, and the owner of the data wasn't aware of it. (We don't really know whose fault that is; maybe the guy just didn't read the memo from IT.) Are they encrypting the data so that only the owner can decode it? Is the backup process opt-in or opt-out? The article doesn't say.

Slashdot Top Deals

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...