Comment Re:Yes "cyberspace" is stupid. (Score 1) 292
I'm actually not particularly a personal fan of stereotypical "Cyber-ideology." I find "techno-salvation" fantasies to primarily consist of trite, puerile escapism; and the communities constructed around them to be riddled with systematic failures. My above defense of "Cyberspace" is in kin spirit to defending free speech even for those blathering pure evil --- but in this case, the battle line is drawn beyond speech, at thought itself. Despite my low opinion of most "cyber-idealists," the logic underlying Lind's argument is too insidious to let slide. Basically, "because a free, idealized Cyberspace has never and cannot exist under the current order, folks should give up thinking/talking about it at all." I'm fine with arguing against the ideas of Cyberspace (or debating the likelihood of Star Trek or the FSM), but not eradicating the entire avenue of thought simply because it contradicts the ideology of current hegemonic corporate/governmental hierarchies.