Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So what? (Score 1) 665

They have that... I believe it's scientology.org. Wikipedia is not the place for it. If you read the scientology related articles, they do a very good job of presenting both sides of the story. The reason scientology is banned is because they have a LONG history of deleting all negative viewpoints, and even whole articles on things like David Miscavage, The Fishman Affadavit, OT3, Tommy Davis, and Xenu, just to name a few. The reason that they were banned was not to disallow them their viewpoint, but rather that they were constantly disallowing others' viewpoints.

Comment Re:Stereotypes usually have some kernal of truth (Score 2, Interesting) 669

You obviously don't have a 2 year old niece then, who screams bloody murder if she gets anything that's not pink, and throws it at her little brother. We can't even wrap her presents in paper that's not pink... she won't open them. She wasn't taught that, and the family has tried not to encourage it, but that's just how she is. Hopefully she'll grow out of it.

Slashdot Top Deals

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...