Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Already tried (Score 1) 163

Sony used to have a TV stand that had a built-in entertainment system (speakers, subwoofer, receiever, DVD player - this was before BluRay) back when I sold electronics in the mid 2000s. No one bought the thing because it was overpriced and what happens when something breaks? You have to take the whole damn thing in to get something fixed.

But, this is IKEA, so it probably comes in 1500 pieces and uses cartoon drawings of people putting it together that you'll want to slash in the throat before you get done putting it together.

Comment Re:Scare quotes (Score 1) 537

About five years ago, in an airport in Virginia, returning from a weekend in Williamsburg, I was pulled aside because there were bricks of opaque material in my bag. I was questioned for about 10 minutes about the contents, then a dog was brought over to sniff my bag. The agent then took my bag around the corner, and when he came back with it, said I was good to go.

The bricks? Three pounds of fudge for my family. :|

Comment Re:From the text. (Score 1) 275

I'm not even sure if Walden read the amendment, because I can not in any way see how he derived his criticisms from this text.

Well, it's an amendment to a bill that's supposed to make the FCC more transparent, then you basically throw in a clause that says, "but, hey, if it's for online privacy, they just ignore all this shit we've been working on. Fuck transparency when comes to online privacy."

So, basically, the FCC can craft some corporate-friendly bullshit, call it "to protect online privacy," and not have to tell anyone until after they've made the rule.

Comment Re:Google+ and Facebook are ethically bankrupt (Score 5, Insightful) 104

Why do you find it odious?

If you want privacy, don't subscribe to a social network. Simple as that.

How does that make them ethically bankrupt? Is there some sort of forced sign-up that I'm not aware of?

I am actually glad they require that, so I don't have to endure stupid screen names like "KOOLDUDE" or "@yourmom" or even "Pionar".

Quit with the hyperbole, Chicken Little.

Comment Re:Citizenship not required? (Score 1) 199

Also, I wonder how they're going to calculate the gross financial loss to the victim (unless the real victim here is the middleman between the government and the individual doing the work, not the government itself). It's not like the government was planning to sell that software. So even if it paid 9 million dollars to get that code written, it doesn't sound like they lost anything by his actions (unless they can prove they have to do additional work trying to make it more secure because of him).

Financial loss isn't just lost revenues, it could be the cost of re-engineering parts of the system in which the private, proprietary algorithms are no longer private and proprietary.

It could also be the cost of extra security measures needed to combat any holes that were exposed by the source being "in the wild."

Comment Re:Bullshit with the best (Score 2) 413

The exception is low-income earners, who pay more in the US than in other countries (many countries have a 0% tax bracket for the first $x of income per year, but US income taxes kick in from the first dollar).

That's kind of disingenuous. Low-income people have lots of deductions and credits. When I was a poor broke college student earning $15,000 a year in a part-time job, I actually had negative tax liabilities, one year to the tune of about $350.

Not saying I'd rather be poor again, just saying, it's not as extreme as you make it out to be.

Comment Re:It's working (Score 1) 448

True, but I also have known officers attacked by meth heads who are tweaking and have read too many stories about people here in my state of Indiana being killed when meth labs inevitably explode.

So, I do know both sides and don't have a position because I know enough to know that I don't know enough to have one.

Comment Re:It's working (Score 1) 448

I was not commenting on which is best, I was just pointing out that the GP was using self-sourced figures in his argument. I have no opinion on the war on drugs nor the prohibition of alcohol in the 20's, as to this point, neither has a direct effect on my life.

Slashdot Top Deals

A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth

Working...