Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Dammit... (Score 1) 494

Whether in the end there's one copy sitting on a book shelf, one copy sitting on a hard drive, or three copies sitting on three hard drives makes no difference to the point that was being made.

Except that those three copies can be read concurrently instead of serially. In the grand scheme of things it doesn't make a huge difference, but it is a difference.

Comment Re:Dammit... (Score 5, Insightful) 494

If I lend a book to ten people, then copyright law considers that fine. If I put something on a P2P network and two people download it, I get a statutory fine of several thousand dollars (well, I would if I lived in the USA). There seems to be some disconnect there.

Not defending the publishing industry, but there is a material difference: your copy lent to ten people remains a single copy and returns to you (you hope), but the one you uploaded to two others has become three copies. Still, I don't doubt the publishing industry is inflating the losses.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...