A seriously good lockpick will spend a good 15 minutes on his knees fiddling around with the tumblers
Not since some enterprising soul discovered bump keys. Now it's trivially easy for anyone to "pick" most pin locks.
Whether in the end there's one copy sitting on a book shelf, one copy sitting on a hard drive, or three copies sitting on three hard drives makes no difference to the point that was being made.
Except that those three copies can be read concurrently instead of serially. In the grand scheme of things it doesn't make a huge difference, but it is a difference.
If I lend a book to ten people, then copyright law considers that fine. If I put something on a P2P network and two people download it, I get a statutory fine of several thousand dollars (well, I would if I lived in the USA). There seems to be some disconnect there.
Not defending the publishing industry, but there is a material difference: your copy lent to ten people remains a single copy and returns to you (you hope), but the one you uploaded to two others has become three copies. Still, I don't doubt the publishing industry is inflating the losses.
While they're at it they should vote to make PI equal to three
"May I ask who I'm speaking to?"
*click*
Damn! They abandoned the scam just because you ended the sentence with a preposition?
No, it was because he used "who" instead of "whom."
And why cats?
Quite. The Chinese eat cats.
But is the average Safari user's cache weighing in at several gigabytes? I don't think so. That was just put there to cause alarm for attention-getting reasons.
Mine was 1.38GB and I'm a fairly average user. And that was with Top Sites disabled.
An interesting approach to hotel stealing is going with the game and putting a price list somewhere visible. I've seen this in NYC.
A place we stay in AZ has nice bathrobes in the room, with a note mentioning that a $100 charge will be gladly added to your bill if a robe walks off.
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein