Revisiting a topic I've dealt with before; what is the purpose of a journal? I am beginning to think more and more that it is less about making my thoughts available to others and more about contstructing them solidly in my own head. Detailing my inner workings in such a constructed way supposedly allows me better insight into said inner workings. Much the same way that my postcards to Neal force brevity onto a traditionally unbrief conversation, the journal format forces structure on thoughts which are generally better classified as rambling, unstructured, and haphazard. The process then becomes mental exercise to strengthen my thinking muscle. At the same time, it allows me a reference to previous structures and thoughts. Or so the theory would imply, anyways.
Perhaps putting it on the web isn't about allowing other people to read it, but more about a sense of responsibility to continue journalling. If I commit my thoughts to some publically available space, does the public come to expect those thoughts to keep coming? That train of thought leads back to the earlier "metajournalling" subject-- If I know someone is reading, I won't want to post. If I know that there are no readers, I have no motivation to post.
So, acknowledging that the action itself is for me, not my readers, frees me to do or not do it as often or as sparsely as I deem fit. But, acknowledging that the action does have consequence, i.e. someone is reading and may be affected by what I have to say, encourages me to keep coming back.
Regardless, my Berenger remains unfixed. I am starting a woodworking project which should tie me up for a week or so. I love the smell of sawdust, the feel of the wood's grain under my fingers. (but I hate sanding.) I have a lovely piece of mahogany which will become a shelf, I hope. It's been a long time since I made sawdust. No matter. I look forward to it.
I think I shall write about Turkey soon.