My wife and I (IT geek + Engineering Geek) have been married for just over 20 years. Here are the pearls of wisdom from my Grandfather which will always work: Marriage is NOT a 50/50 deal. If everyone puts in 100%, you will succeed.
What he's doing does not hurt me. What does hurt me/us/the whole country is when a vendor welds their device closed so that it cannot be modified by the rightful owner *or their agent*. He has the wrong approach. IMO, if the product is locked down so that I don't have the rights to do whatever the hell I want with it, I'd rather not buy it.
The answer to this is simple: If you don't like the terms of the GPL V2, you should not have released your code under those terms. To quote the GPL "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee."
Provided they are in compliance with every other part of the GPL, the fact that you don't think they are the appropriate vendor is irrelevant; get over yourself.
On the other hand... recording said conversation with full transparency and knowledge of all participants (note: knowledge, not permission) ensures that they are fully aware that all statements are "on the record" and should they fail to follow through on favorable statements or in fact attempt to press you into service beyond the customary two (three, in your case) weeks notice, then you will have been damaged as a result of false statements. IANAL, but I'd bet my last dollar that would be actionable even in an at-will employment state.
Maybe not so simple. Ever smelled a building with dead animal carcasses in the wall? OMG, it smells like something died in there... oh wait...
-Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
A student here in Arizona was strip searched at a high school because the school administration got a tip that she might be carrying and distributing prescription strength ibuprofen. The legality of this strip search has been contested and the case has made it's way to the Supreme Court: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/01/16/20090116school-strip0116-ON.html
That is High School. If this original person involved is in higher education, then the law is pretty clear: Search and Seizure without reasonable suspicion of a crime is in fact a crime.
I think the suggestion is that we not publish the names of "alleged" criminals. By all means, people convicted of a crime should have their names brought to public attention.
Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.