Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Atheist (Score 1) 583

There isn't, however, enough evidence to tell me that there is a being that created everything, could control everything but chooses not to, could see the future but chooses not to, etc.

Is it possible that things exist that you don't know about?

Here's the meaning of life: We're given free will. This place is a test to determine whether we'll give that free will back to God or use it for our own wants. If God were to intervene and control everything, we wouldn't have free will.

God doesn't choose not to see the future. The bible is full of (fulfilled and as-yet unfulfilled) prophecy.

Comment Re:Atheist (Score 1) 583

Things that "exist" are observable, and hence knowable, as part of the real world. If something is unknowable in principle, it doesn't exist, by definition.

Is it possible that there are things in this universe (and outside of it) that exist, yet are unknowable, or even haven't been discovered yet?

Comment Re:Atheist (Score 1) 583

I'm a chrsitian and found your arguments interesting.

We haven't found the hand of god measurably influencing the lives of faithful [people who believe in God], but if anything could influence the course of events profoundly and cover his tracks, it would be god.

I'd like to point out that the Bible is full of historical accounts of God intervening directly in human history in ways that were obvious to everyone. Unfortunately for us, they're all in ancient times. And many non-christians of course question the truth of everything in the bible (in spite of a 100% prophecy success rate).

God doesn't intervene in such overt ways now for a number of reasons. But stay tuned. If we are indeed living in the end times as most christians believe, God will shortly be forced to intervene in a war against Israel in order to prevent a defenseless Israel from being crushed. We're not sure exactly how it's supposed to happen, but it is supposed to be spectacular, resulting in the death of (iirc) 7/8 of the people in the invading armies.

Comment Re:Atheist (Score 1) 583

Nonsense! Rejecting superstition on the grounds that there is no scientific evidence is not blind faith, it is purely logical.

Before we discovered...say... other galaxies. Did they not exist anyway? There was up until that point no scientific evidence that they or anything like them existed. Did they *poof* into existence when we suddenly found evidence? Or did they exist throughout the entirety of our ignorance?

What's more close-minded, assuming that everything you know is all that exists, or that there are possibilities in the universe (and outside of it) that are more amazing than your mind could comprehend?

Comment Re:Next up on slashdot: (Score 1) 1027

I'm not familiar with the guy in question, and maybe he really is a nut, however...

That is actually the closest I have seen to a sensible response to this. Slashdot needs a way of marking stories "flamebait".

Follow the links throught to Robert Sungenis's site. He is a complete nut case. He is a creationist,

So am I. Although I suspect the actual story of creation is not entirely understood by christians and completely misunderstood by non-christians.

probably anti-semitic,

I don't understand antisemitism. There's a lot of christians (Mel Gibson comes to mind) who seem to hate jews, but claim to be followers of christ, who was a jew... I don't get it.

conspiracy theorist.

This one is politically charged. Are you claiming that anyone who suggests an alternate story to the official government story is somehow insane? What if the alternate story is right and the government is lying? Do you believe everything your government tells you? Anyone who has taken and understood physics 101 can see that something was seriously wrong with the official story of the building 7 collapse. And where's the plane wreckage in PA and at the pentagon? How does a 757 fit through a 16ft diameter hole and not leave the wings outside the building? I'm not sure what really happened on 9/11. But I'm convinced that the government story is a (laughably poor) lie.

Now the bit about how the moon landings were faked... I've examined their evidence. And what it looks like to me is that a lot of the photos were doctored, like a 70s version of photoshop, which is what I think they're latching on to. But I seriously doubt the landings were faked.

And JFK? Government lying.

It's our responsibility to not take "official stories" as fact without examining the evidence ourselves. Critical thinking is important and necessary.

The "news alert" links on the front page of one of his sites include one to a site that claims that the Vatican has been infiltrated by "satanic cults".

This is entirely possible. Do you have proof one way or the other? What if I told you that in the book of revelations in the bible, it describes a one-world religion that will be forced on everyone (including atheists) to go along with the one-world government, and the description for that one-world religion perfectly fits (what will likely be the remnants of) the roman catholic church? Is this really that impossible? The pope already seems to be abandoning some christian values while embracing ecumenism. And if pedophiles can get into the church, why not satanists? Maybe the word "satanist" is too sensational and it's really something more subtle. There seems to be a lot of "luciferian" religious teaching around these days disguised as the new age movement or "many ways to get to God". Maybe this is what he's talking about?

Why is this even worth discussing?

Because some of it may actually be true, and because we're not sheep?

Comment Re:I am not surprised. (Score 1) 1027

If you believe that somehow your deity is not affected by the laws of formal logic, but simultaneously believe in science, which is based on the faith (for it is faith) that underlying all things is a universal set of rules which can be expressed using math, you are believing things which cannot simultaneously be. You are then forced to train yourself in doublethink -- and people do that: they terrify me. Basically forcing yourself to be schizophrenic is not a sane attitude. That is "being religious".

God is a super-dimensional being. That is, God operates outside of our space-time while still having access to it. This is why he's everywhere and always. And eternity makes a lot more sense in that context. It also allows for God to not be affected by formal logic or science or the laws of physics. Yet in this world, we're bound by all these things. This world, these laws, this universe, they're God's creation. And because of that, he has complete control over all of it.

In my opinion, this is what non-christians who practice the religion of science* are missing. They think all that there is and all that can be stops at the edge of our known universe, and anything that goes beyond our universe, or even their understanding of our universe is simply impossible. Tell me again who's narrow-minded?

With God, all things are possible.

* To me, science is the study of God's creation. And there's nothing wrong with that. I even have a science degree. However, it's important that we not allow science to become a religion and a replacement for God.

Comment Re:Ololololo (Score 1) 414

In [religion], when your [interpretation] is falsified by the data being different from its predictions, you abandon it and look for a different [interpretation].

In [science], when the predictions of your dogma turn out to be wrong, you tell your critics that they just don't understand how [science] works, and really with a deeper understanding you were right all along.

Comment Re:A Master Media Whore... (Score 1) 1695

Some pastor who leads a might congregation of 50 members, in a run-down part of a state known for below-average intelligence, has come up with an incredibly short-sighted plan and now the whole world is talking about him. While no reasonable person would overlook the stupidity of such a stunt, this guy basks in the controversy. We can't turn on the news anywhere without seeing either him or his trailer. Even though his event is centered around a group of people smaller in numbers than an average wedding reception he has managed to get himself condemned by people all over the world.
 

While his actions are stupid, the effects - in terms of drawing massive attention - are brilliant. Just wait for copy-cat backwater churches elsewhere to fight for the next great stunt; my money is on someone to burn Obama in effigy behind their church next.

So maybe it's not so stupid. For the cost of a few korans, he gets the word out about his views on islam while also showing the world how peaceful the Religion of Peace actually is.

Considering some 20% of the US still believes Obama is himself a Muslim (or "Moslem" as this guy prefers), it might be sold as a sequel to this stunt.

Maybe the reason they think he's a muslim is because he's tried to appear that way to muslims, while also doing and saying things that make christians think he's not a christian, in spite of what he tells people.

Comment Re:Gospel purposes... (Score 1) 1695

For those of us who are a bit more conservative in our Christianity (many here may call me a fundie - the pastor burning the books would probably call me a lefty, so there you go...), this book burning issue is sad not because of the intolerance and idiocy that it shows, but because it serves no Gospel purpose. It will push Muslims away from Christianity (as well as Western values in general - many non-western Muslims link nationality and religion together). It does nothing to fulfill the Great Commission - the idea that Christ commanded us to go into the world and preach the Gospel (man is a sinner in need of a Saviour, provided by Christ's death on the Cross).

It just does the opposite.

I'm not so sure about that. Spreading the gospel isn't just about love, peace, happiness, and salvation. You're supposed to also give a warning about the eternity in hell for those who do not repent. I believe there's way too much of a warm fuzzy feeling in the world today about islam. Muslims are trying to spin their religion as a religion of peace, when the koran is very clear that they should kill anyone who doesn't convert. (it even gives clear instructions for how to behead someone) When political correctness is on their side, people may start to believe the propaganda. This could result in people who are on the fence converting to islam. As christians, we need to be telling as many people as possible that islam is a demonic creation and leads to condemnation. Anything that we can do that reveals the true nature of christianity and islam can only help our cause.

Burning a stack of korans is very provocative. And you can tell who they really are by watching their reaction. As others have pointed out, merely the suggestion that he might do this leads a multitude of muslims to actually burn bibles and other similar acts. I'm surprised muslims haven't burned actual christians over this yet. Jesus didn't stand outside the temple and tell people how nice he was about his dealings with money, then hope people would draw their own conclusions about the money changers inside. He actually went inside and did something provocative. So to me, this is just as provocative and effective as a fire and brimstone sermon. We need to preach the nice feel-good things about the gospel while also talking about the things no one seems to want to talk about. Jesus did both. So should we.

Comment Re:Stupid (Score 1, Troll) 1695

Islamic world: "Die for insulting our moon god!"

Christian world: "Die for insulting our sky god!"

The difference between christianity and islam is that when a christian acts out in violence, he's disobeying the ideology of his religion. When a muslim acts out in violence, he's following the ideology of his religion.

Christianity is the real religion of peace. Islam is demonic creation.

Comment Boolean Stoves (Score 5, Insightful) 312

When my wife and I first got married, she was an awful cook. I mean, it was really bad, like she was trying to kill me and collect the life insurance. So one night, I analyzed her cooking technique. I discovered that for her, the stove was a boolean device. That is, it was either on (10) or off (0). All those numbers in between 0 and 10 were there for decoration. Luckily my wife was really smart, getting As in organic chemistry for example. So i started speaking a different language.

Cooking is all about heat transfer. Heat will conduct from the outside of food to the inside of food (microwaves aside) at the same rate, depending on the substance. If you turn the heat up, it won't simply cook faster. The outside will burn before enough heat has transferred to the inside. This was enough for her to have an epiphany, suddenly realizing what all those numbers between 0 and 10 were for.

Comment Re:Legal maneuvers (Score 1) 107

The premise was 'group a has been brainwashed by people to believe this...'

Then you come in 'hey! I'm from group a and thats not true.'

It does seem sort of silly. Not that I think you are put in a very fair position.

It's more like this: Group A thinks bla. I say, "I'm from group A and we don't think bla." Someone else comes in and says, "You said you're from group A which means you're brainwashed."

I could argue that non-christians have been brainwashed by this society and the point would be just as valid.

Comment Re:Legal maneuvers (Score 1, Insightful) 107

I'm glad you prefaced that comment with, "As a christian..." so I could just ignore the rest of it as brainwashed nonsense.

There's a problem with your thinking. A non-christian says that christians think this or that. Then a christian suggests that they're wrong. Then you say that my response is brainwashed nonsense. I'm a member of the group he was talking about. Doesn't it make sense to ask a member of the group what they think rather than jumping to conclusions?

I can tell you that you can't group christians together into a large group and say that they're all this way or that way. We have all of the problems that non-christians have. Some of us are smart, and some not so smart. Some have money and some are destitute. Some educated and some not. So you can't look at christians and conclude that they made the decision they made based on education or intelligence. It must be something else.

OF COURSE marriage is just another way for religion to control our sex lives.

Would it surprise you to know that i got married in the same government building where you pay speeding tickets? The bible gives some guidelines on how to behave. And the end result is that it's really just normal behavior that almost everyone else does, just within marriage. The church has no idea what we do, why, or how often. They don't ask and we don't volunteer the information. Not much control there.

In Arab countries the church IS the state and vice versa and they try to control every single aspect of people's lives - in public and in their own home. Fundamentalist Christians who would have their way would like to see the same thing here, only instead of in the name of Mohamed it would be in the name of "Jeay-zuzz!"

I can tell you that most christians *don't* want a theocracy, although most people here on slashdot seem to think otherwise. We also dislike islam as much as anyone else. There are certain things we'd like stopped, abortion for example, not because we're trying to force our religion on others, but because we look at it as no different from bumping off grandma for example when it gets too expensive to care for her. I'm willing to bet there are a lot of non-christians who are also against abortion. But we never hear about them in these discussions.

This entire situation is solely created by superstition and the church's power lust.

We have a set of beliefs. And these beliefs are supposed to be respected in civilized society. When was the last time someone called Islam or Buddhism a superstition?

As for power lust, I believe that the catholic church used to behave like an imperialist monarchy. But those days are long-gone. And no protestant church has ever behaved in that manner. So where's the power lust? It's certainly not here today. I'm free to leave my church whenever I like with no repercussions.

Just another example of why religion is the single biggest roadblock to the advancement of the human race.

Advancing to where? I would argue that we are indeed a roadblock on the advancement to destruction. Stay tuned... Watch what happens when the roadblock is removed.

But it least it helps promote it's own opposition and hopefully that opposition will continue to get smarter and stronger and we can wipe out this plague that has had our species mentally shackled for 2000 years.

Here's what's going to happen: We're all going to vanish. They'll lie and cook up some crazy reason why we're gone. Then things will get bad... really bad. You'll have one last chance over the course of 7 years if you manage live through it. If you refuse, you'll spend eternity regretting your actions.

I would encourage you to be open-minded about christianity. Why would so many people choose to become christians? Does it really make sense that they're all stupid? You've expressed some of the same misinformed attitudes that many express here on slashdot. Instead of being a sheep and repeating what the world tells you to, why not investigate it for yourself? Visit a few churches and ask to make an appointment with a pastor to talk about it. Give them an opportunity to explain it to you better than I could. If you're going to decide that it's not true, at least decide for yourself after doing your own research. Otherwise, you're just a sheep. I think you'll find that you stand to gain far more than you could ever lose.

Slashdot Top Deals

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...