Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth

Debunking a Climate-Change Skeptic 807

DJRumpy writes "The Danish political scientist Bjørn Lomborg won fame and fans by arguing that many of the alarms sounded by environmental activists and scientists — that species are going extinct at a dangerous rate, that forests are disappearing, that climate change could be catastrophic — are bogus. A big reason Lomborg was taken seriously is that both of his books, The Skeptical Environmentalist (in 2001) and Cool It (in 2007), have extensive references, giving a seemingly authoritative source for every one of his controversial assertions. So in a display of altruistic masochism that we should all be grateful for (just as we're grateful that some people are willing to be dairy farmers), author Howard Friel has checked every single citation in Cool It. The result is The Lomborg Deception, which is being published by Yale University Press next month. It reveals that Lomborg's work is 'a mirage,' writes biologist Thomas Lovejoy in the foreword. '[I]t is a house of cards. Friel has used real scholarship to reveal the flimsy nature' of Lomborg's work."

Comment Re:I downloaded Chromium a few days ago (Score 1) 319

Apparently, one of the absolute worst sites for the overall performance of Firefox is this one.

If you have NoScript in your Firefox, and it looks like you do, block slashdot.org from running its scripts. This will disable dynamic index - if you ever cared about that functionality), - but the speed of site rendering will return to the more or less expected level.

Comment Re:How is it different (Score 1) 319

I don't see why shifting the managerial focus to commercial enterprise will do anything to advance pure science.

It depends on what your scientific endeavor is. Is it a science of space flight? Or is it a science that you conduct in space and you just need a ride to get there? You are absolutely correct if all we are talking about are different delivery mechanisms - conventional rockets, high altitude assisted launches, scram engines, The Elevator, etc. If those are the subject(s) of the scientific research, then definitely (IMHO) a commercial enterprise will not help you a whole lot (if at all) today.

However, if you send humans into space to do science in some lab up there, on a moon, on Mars, etc., then whoever delivers your scientists to the lab is not much more than a glorified taxi driver. Do you build your own car to commute to work? Actually, if I remember the history correctly, some people in the early days of automobile did just that - built their own cars. But nowadays if you do not have your own car you hire a taxi. So extending this analogy as far as I can ;-) Lockheed and Boeing are your local car/truck rental agency - U-Haul maybe ;-) or "Two Guys and a Truck" (because they actually deliver stuff to orbit, almost every other week). Alternatively you can hire a truck with a Chinese or a Russian or (some time later) maybe even an Indian driver.

It all depends on what your goal is...

Technology

Using EMP To Punch Holes In Steel 165

angrytuna writes "The Economist is running a story about a group of researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology in Chemnitz, Germany, who've found a way to use an EMP device to shape and punch holes through steel. The process enjoys advantages over both lasers, which take more time to bore the hole (0.2 vs. 1.4 seconds), and by metal presses, which can leave burrs that must be removed by hand."

Comment Re:Not so fast ... (Score 1) 736

I always heard "You can have it fast, good, or cheap, pick two"

And yet, while well known, it is a gross oversimplification. For instance, "fast, good, but expensive" is also known as the task of making a "baby in a month by 9 women" ;-) Unfortunately the solution of the "fast, good, or cheap" is much closer to 1 than to 2.

Comment Re:Kids? What are these "kids" you speak of? (Score 1) 619

because it's not like we don't have any siblings with kids or friends with kids or were kids ourselves

A car analogy ;-) Do you remember the time when you were not able to drive yet? But you had a pretty good idea, right? Because your parents had a car (or cars) and some of your older friends did drive and you've seen many times how it is done and knew all the intricate details about driving. Then you started driving... Do you recall those first few times? And yet you had a pretty good idea. Same with kids. All of us were kids ;-) and many had siblings with kids, and we new families with kids and had heard their stories. Then our own kids arrived... and sleepless nights and worries and seemingly perpetual attention they needed (at least in the beginning). Knowing and experiencing are not quite the same.

PS: Another interesting (and IMHO vivid) analogy would be sex ;-)

Comment Re:I caught a 9AM showing on Saturday (Score 1) 820

I caught a 9AM showing on Saturday. Surprisingly few single guys there. Mostly middle-aged couples.

Just a guess - everybody else is either still in bed or just woke up ;-) And, another guess, it probably would pay not to be a pessimist this time - it was even more enjoyable to see a good movie when "the Damn Kids" were enjoying it too. It was fun to observe 4 (18ish) girls trying the "live long a prosper" gesture that they learned by the Spock-to-Spock scene. Talking about "Generations"... ;-)

Comment Re:10 Years, not Infinity+ years (Score 1) 597

in fact, it would make people stop using their heads

Certainly, because patents and profit are the only factors that would motivate a person...

Without a patent, everyone would just use the 1st method and nobody would want to improve upon it.

Note how badly we, the humanity, had to struggle before July 31, 1790 - same stone wheels, same obsidian tools, same clay tablets (or were they invented and patented later?), etc...

Editorial

Submission + - Is Intellectual Property the Key to Success? (mises.org)

corbettw writes: "The Mises Institute, a libertarian think tank, has an interesting article up today about intellectual property. From the article: The repeal of intellectual property legislation, writes Jeffrey Tucker, would do nothing to remove from business its capacity to create, innovate, advertise, market, and distribute. The repeal of IP might create for it an additional cost of doing business, namely efforts to ensure that consumers are aware of the difference between the genuine product and impersonators. This is a cost of business that every enterprise has to bear. Patents and trademarks have done nothing to keep Gucci and Prada and Rolex impersonators at bay. But neither have the impersonators killed the main business. If anything, they might have helped, since imitation is the best form of flattery."
Businesses

Submission + - The First Thing IT Managers Do in the Morning?

An anonymous reader writes: When I was a wee-little IT Manager, I interviewed for a IT management position at an online CRM provider in San Francisco, a job I certainly was qualified for, at least on paper. One of the interviewer's questions was "What is the first thing you do when you get to work in the morning." I thought saying "Read Slashdot" wouldn't be what he was looking for — so I made up something, I'm sure, equally lame. Needless to say, I didn't get the job. But the question has stuck with me over the years. What do real IT and MIS managers do when they walk in to the office in the morning? What web sites or tools do they look at or use the first thing? Tell me. And remember, this is for posterity, so be honest.
It's funny.  Laugh.

Submission + - How much caffiene is really in that soda pop? (ift.org)

The Fun Guy writes: The Institute of Food Technologists summarizes some recent research that should settle some arguments among geeks:

Caffeine is a well-known stimulant added as an ingredient to various carbonated soft drinks, but which drink contains the most, and how can consumers know? A study in the Journal of Food Science used high-performance liquid chromatography to analyze the caffeine contents of 56 national-brand and 75 private-label store brand carbonated beverages. Caffeine contents ranged from 4.9 mg/12 oz (IGA Cola) to 74 mg/12 oz (Vault Zero). Some of the more common national-brand carbonated beverages analyzed in this study were Coca-Cola (33.9 mg/12 oz), Diet Coke (46.3 mg/12 oz), Pepsi (38.9 mg/12 oz), Diet Pepsi (36.7 mg/12 oz), Dr Pepper (42.6 mg/12 oz), Diet Dr Pepper (44.1 mg/12 oz), Mountain Dew (54.8 mg/12 oz), and Diet Mountain Dew (55.2 mg/12 oz). The authors found that store-brand beverages generally contained less caffeine, and they also suggest that consumers would benefit from having the actual caffeine content labeled on the beverage.

Slashdot.org

Submission + - " "

An anonymous reader writes: "






"

Slashdot Top Deals

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...