So, we can hope this bill is harmless and holds up in court for real copyright infringement cases (if it passes the house which I hope it doesn't), or we can assume lawyers will use this to basically shut down the internet, or at least the search part of it, I mean, Google is an information company, which provides a massive search for illegal files, I can see it in court now

Google Lawyer: "But your honor we do not target these rouge servers with illegal files, they are just massively linked and our engine lists them automatically"

DA: "No sir, I did a search for "warez" on Google.com and it said displaying 25 of 5,019,193,012 sites.. which proves they just provide illegal software"

Judge: Point taken, shut them down! Who's next!

This is so obvious it hurts..

Funny, when Firefox went to the new style of annoyance (three step process) I made a post on the message boards to go back to the older style where it just prompted that it was invalid, click okay and you kept going. The devs/admins/users blasted back about how it was needed, how it helped, etc, and just as told them (a year + ago), finally research shows that most certs are invalid and out of date, but thats allllright because I quit using FF. It just scares me that the people that are smart enough to be involved with the programming and management of one of the most used web browsers have no insight to how the web is operating beneath them, don't they ever surf outside the mozilla domain? Weird.

These were people coming to see a remake of Wrath of Khan, how hard is it to impress them when you show them a new Star Trek film? I mean it would be like going to a Republican convention and finding someone that would enjoy Rush Limbaugh's newest book, your not trying very hard. I would go as far as to say

FAIL.

Much like the banking industry I think the software one is living in a bubble that is poping.

let just take what they said above as right: they need $10 million (previous console version) and usually sell 150,000 copies.

well 150,000x59.99=$8,998,500

so that's 9 million of the "first line suckers" then I'm sure you can dig up another few million as you decrease the price to something more sane. so that was easy.

Now they need $25 million, I guess somehow Dakitana 2 was that much better, Now let's see the time frame.

(using XBOX) released in 2001 discontinued in 2006

(using XBOX360) released in 2005 , still going.

now we are talking an increase in cost of over 2.5 times, in a time frame of around 10 years.

Fellow Slashers, This is some BS if I ever smelled it. What other industry do you know of that is basically an oligopoly, and the price of the goods they produce has INCREASED over the life of the long run, and their cost to manufacture has "Somehow" Increased over the same time?

Right-o chaps, I'm glad everyone in California drives Bentleys to go to work and sit in a cubical and code a game all day while doing a Nerf assault on the next guy, but don't whine that it costs to much, you just have no idea how to control spending just like the rest of the bloody market and your bubble is about to pop. (or is in the process)

Does that mean drug dealers are committing treason? I mean, the government actually declared a war on that.

Want a real test for the trial? Just say it is impossible to hack, then stand back and watch the flames "No one will cross the line the sand until you draw it." - me.

I bring to my subject these commandments, I call them Laws. Such as Law of Demand and Law of Supply. Here is thy Bible for thee with questions. http://www.amazon.com/Micro-Economy-DiscoverEcon-Solman-Videos/dp/0073137847/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235136905&sr=8-2