Or a conspiracy in your head - aside from taking physics with someone called "Newton" - having no person of note by the name _alive_ before now in the span of the oldest living Human's life - and somehow taking an interpretation from him which lies on the assumption of a read maxwell's demon - I'd go with "it's in your head, hippy" in conjunction with "they compared March this year to April of previous years for a reason and your dumb ass ignored the month chosen entirely"

http://xkcd.com/1022/

He's clearly high.

Proper grammar isn't a sign of education - language exists to communicate, when the message is understood it is valid - if a grammatical error can even impact the message there are bigger issues at play than the grammar (vocabulary, mental retardation, etc).

The grammar nazi: queen troll of the interwebs.

Nice generic smaller technology quip, but I think you missed the point of TFA and what the posters you were responding to (hint, they read and understood it). You should actually read it, its more about a change in the understanding of physics than new chips.

I'm already in Karma hell, -5 Troll me!

It's stored on their cloud you dumb shit, of course their collecting it.

More easily.

Yes, they are words that have specific meanings, and that was the basis of my comment. For instance to say "By definition, liberals spy on government and conservatives spy on people, so really, your argument falls flat on its face" is not only incorrect, it flies in the face of conservative ideologies. You cannot have a government _capable_ of spying on people if you have a conservative government, the whole fucking ideology is based around limited (ie: CONSERVATIVE) government.

Typical Liberal, spewing pop culture and failing all around.

If we are allowed to bring strawman party specific definitions I think I'd win. For instance: Liberals are responsible for all ill in the world, by definition. Conservatives don't believe the government should be large enough to spy on people, Liberals _feel_ otherwise (a symptom of having a broken cortex or few in their head).

Mod Parent Up

While perhaps not an unreasonable claim taken as itself, when you consider these are, not the world's smartest animals, being trained by not the world's smartest government employees - you have to take reality into account. A more reasonable thing might be to have a document for each animal indicating what it's signal is, that is automatically admitted to court in any dog-signal-centered case.

lmfao