I, as a web developer, have never used "radius-border", since the property is "border-radius"

I use webkit browsers. Therefore your assertion that we all don't is incorrect. And for the record most of us webdevs used: -webkit-border-radius: ... -moz-border-radius: ... -o-border-radius: ... -ms-border-radius: ... /* just in case */ border-radius: ... until we got sick of it and dropped all the prefixed versions.

I wish I had points to mod this up. So much anti-Microsoft vitriol, no one even noticed that the contested CSS property is written wrong.

You remember the parable of the space pen? How the pragmatic socialists used a pencil instead? And then the dare-to-dream capitalists ended up winning the cold war, because they were willing to explore interesting things and discover new tech and ideas and stuff, even when a simpler solution was obvious? Yeah, that.

CS is not programming, and programming is not CS. Which raises a new question, when people in this discussion or the article or anywhere else say "programming" what exactly do they mean?

When you say "House" you mean "US Congress," right? Not "fictional tv doctor."

Do (atomic) crystals count as molecules?

Er, sure, except that they're completely different, because "weight" is a force, measured in newtons (or some scaled variant thereof) and mass is a fundamental property, measured in kilograms (or some scaled variant thereof). Don't go bringing any weird American "1 pound ~= 1 pound" nonsense in here.

Except that I can still hear my mouse through every on-board sound system I've used recently.

TFA actually addresses that explicitly. In fact, it's the thrust of the entire article. "As I type this, I’m sitting ~32 inches away from a 27-inch monitor with a resolution of 1920×1080, or 81.59 PPI. At that distance, my monitor would need to pack at least 107 PPI (pixels per inch) in order to qualify as a Retina display."

What about bit depth? A bazillion pixels is all well and good, but I still find it frustrating that those pixels are limited to 256 grey levels. What would it take to bump displays up an extra couple of bits per channel? Or even doubling them? I think the visual improvement from HDR would trump that of higher pixel density, at least in the things that matter to me (games and movies).

Oh, that's right, this was posted on /. a few years ago: http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/04/29/1516231/a-touch-screen-with-morphing-buttons Heh, same thing was reported on by the same site as the current FA: http://singularityhub.com/2009/08/20/a-flexible-touch-screen-changes-surface-to-match-display/

The Matrix is sort of the opposite -- a technological perpetuation of sociological problems. I was thinking more along the lines of Terminator.

You could call it the Fricative model. Flow is restricted but never Stops. By the way, my experience here in Australia is that they say it's "capped, but we'll throttle if you go over" as opposed to the other, which is "capped, but we'll charge your for excess". I don't recall ever seeing an "unlimited" plan here.