Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:I don't think you understand. (Score 1) 735

No it doesn't. You can be religious and think ID is a bunch of hooey. This isn't an either-or proposition.

Of course it isn't.

But it IS "an either-or proposition" if you insist on a LITERAL interpretation of The Bible.

You can be religious and understand/accept evolution and understand that "The Garden of Eden" was a parable.

You CANNOT believe that The Garden of Eden was a physical location on Earth and understand/accept evolution.

Insistence on a literal intepretation is not a pre-requisite for believing in Adam, the Garden of Eden, eternal sin, or Jesus dying for our sins. You've resorted to a straw man. I don't insist that all the details were exactly as reported. I do believe in the vast majority of the Jesus narrative. I'm open to there having been an actual physical Garden of Eden in some form or fashion, and possibly there being a key ancestral couple like Adam and Eve.

Comment Re:Makes sense. (Score 1) 386

You're right in that there findings are not a big deal. But its also a good thing that they looked into it. Imagine if it had been the computers' fault and nobody checked into it. This kind of shit would just keep happening...

So instead, it's the people's fault, and this kind of shit will just keep happening...

Comment Panopticon (Score 1) 1018

Basically Wikileaks is trying to change the world so that we are so afraid of things we do in private being revealed that we don't do anything bad. They are doing this in the name of the public, and there is something to that, but they don't seem to care if they are crossing the lines between appropriately private matters and ones where the light of day would do significant public good. They absolve themselves of responsibility by adopting a pretty much filterless approach to revelation. There are great costs accompanying the benefits they provide, and though in the grand balance they may have done more good than harm so far, the magnitude of the stakes could tip the scale the other way very quickly.

Comment Re:The amounts are outrageous (Score 2, Insightful) 764

But the message is crystal clear. You can't legally COPY someones work and especially you can't share it.
I'm a writer and I want to get paid for copies of what I write. NO ONE has a right to take my work and
share it with others or copy it without paying. I have every right to expect that what I write IS MINE
TO SELL or give away - but it's MINE.

If you never show it to anybody, it is absolutely yours. If you show it, or distribute it, it is no longer yours in an ownership sense. Copyright is an artificial and temporary right which is granted only as incentive for you to share your creations.

Technically, you don't want to get paid for copies of what you write. You just want to get paid for doing what you like. It just so happens that getting paid for copies of your product is the primary economic mechanism for this compensation in your case. And it is (arguably) worth preserving this mechanism, but not necessarily at the cost of arming abusive corporations so that they can chug along sucking up the lion's share of money derived from OTHER PEOPLE'S creations, while they stifle personal liberty, social and educational commentary, and technological innovation.

I am not a big fan of illegal file sharing, but the *AA have taken advantage of the situation to push a reprehensible agenda.

Comment MOD PARENT UP (Score 1) 313

The best way to avoid terrorism is to live in fear all the time.

Of course, private business could generate just as much fear as the government, but with much lower cost to the private citizen...

Support deprivatization of the fear industry!

Brilliant. Truly brilliant

Comment Re:LiveSQL (Score 1) 78

Interesting idea. Basically would need to establish event triggers on relevant tables. Should also be able to invalidate results that were previously found, and provide updates as well. Would require a lot of memory to persist enough information about the previous results that you don't end up with duplicates. I'll try and check in when you actually have a site.

Comment Re:GPL (Score 1) 154

IANAL, but if you transfer the copyright, they are free to reuse without a license so the version you transfer can still be used by anyone under the GPL, but they are free to modify as needed without any "viral infection". All the same, it would probably still be unacceptable to the lawyers drafting the rules.

Comment What was the question? (Score 1) 1268

The problem is that it is not stated directly what the question is that is being asked, so students are required to infer what the question is. Unfortunately, they just assume the "=" implies a question is "what is 4 + 3 + 2?" since that is the sort of question they are used to being asked. They are probably not used to (a) seeing an equality as a "statement", and (b) inferring from the hole in that statement that there is an implicit question as to what would fill in that hole to make it true.

It's a very easy leap for me, and probably always has been, but for my second-grade son on the autism spectrum it is a nearly insurmountable leap of logic. Our local school system works very hard to encourage this conceptual thinking in math, but at least for my son that is making it even harder for him to shore up the basics.

All that to say, I can understand how this state of affairs could come to be, but am sad to see that middle school kids in general are not exposed to enough logic and inference.

Slashdot Top Deals

6.023 x 10 to the 23rd power alligator pears = Avocado's number