Comment Re:E3 has been bleeding out for some time. (Score 2, Insightful) 48
I don't think "wokeness" killed E3, but holy shit are there ever a lot of unintended implications in what you wrote. I also don't know what skin colour has to do with anything. I had assumed you were trolling but you got up-modded so I think what you're suggesting needs to be prodded at a bit for logic's sake.
So, first question: do LGBT+ women not enjoy looking at attractive women?
Is it "misogyny" that women's fashion magazines, targeted at women, feature models?
If yes, then why did Victoria's Secret recently reverse their decision to drop the "Angels" (source: https://www.cnn.com/style/why-victorias-secret-is-bringing-sexy-back-bof/index.html). Are you suggesting that it's primarily men that buy women's lingerie?
Since you brought heterosexuality, masculinity and skin colour (of all things) into the fold, are you suggesting that minorities don't like sex?
Are you suggesting that women don't like sex? That "sex sells" means "sex sells, but only to men" ?
Is celebrating the disappearance of 'booth babes', by extension, not also celebrating that certain women were put out of work? Just sayin'
I'm all for expanding markets and appealing to the widest possible audience, but we're all human, most humans enjoy "sex, drugs & violence" in our fiction