I don't know about that. Every time I *have* to use a self checkout line I think about how I should start stealing shit until there's people run cashiers again. That's only protest. It's not a psychological disorder to expect to be paid if I'm being put to work.

Why would you 'report that' though? Every industrial or warehouse job site of size has had boxes dispensing acetaminophen/ibuprofen/aspirin and earplugs that I've ever been in, and as a contractor I've been in a lot. That doesn't really say anything to me.

The Kia's in question have this steering lock, however it "believes" the correct key was inserted so it is disengaged.

Narcissists dont think they ever make mistakes, and therefore are unable to learn from them.

I'm not attacking, I'm asking. I didn't say you are wrong about anything.

Sorry, I just accepted the spellcheck that said I spelled methylphenidate wrong. It still wants me to change that, which I have googled this time to be sure I'm right, to methamphetamine. However, without changing the topic here, all stimulants prescribed for ADD are only different dosages, with the same similar effects on developing brains, so it's not like the point was changed.

I did detail what I said you were speaking both sides of, without ever saying you're wrong about anything--because I am asking. You had said methylphenidate had changed a generation of men's brains, and then in that other post I replied to above, I'd said "In the other thread you're saying it's from brain changes taking" *methylphenidate* "while brains are developing, and then you're talking about it like it's everyone in a generation, including your son who never took it." Then, I say, and here is the ask "If there is a thesis in all your posts, I'm missing it."

I detailed the logical inconsistency, and thought the ask was clear. So clear I'm quoting myself to ask again.

It seems though like you're kind of all over the place with this. In the other thread you're saying it's from brain changes taking methamphetamine while brains are developing, and then you're talking about it like it's everyone in a generation, including your son who never took it. If there is a thesis in all your posts, I'm missing it.

Science has nothing to do with trust.

Well, good luck with getting enough states to sign off on those constitutional amendments

Bicycling is both resistance training and cardio. What mix is based on how you go at it. For me it was mostly "weights," in a group, I would pedal half or less as much as all the other guys, in a much higher gear. My legs got huge. You don't build much muscle running, there is never the opportunity to increase the load/resistance/weight. You can get a bit, if you started undersized for your body size/weight, but in general, all you are doing is getting very toned.

This is a totally uninformed assumption, but it *feels* like most people writing articles now never went to school for journalism.

Wow. It's one thing to be on a sinking ship. It's on a whole other level to be envious of being on a sinking ship.

There's no free market anyway. Ticketmaster and subsidiaries monopolize the hell out of ticket sales. We didn't regulate their exclusive deals with nearly every venue, time to regulate the fees bullshit.

Not one of those was an example of authoritarianism.

Next up, $5 a month or we turn off your AM radios again

Not if you already bought into the idea that it's morally wrong. Some people find it very difficult to get over that kind of religious programing.