Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:ROI (Score 1) 710

The current trend is to get a lot of recessed lights and stick the cheapest CFLs in them. They look terrible though. Even the best CFLs have 82 CRI and a very spiky spectrum using a triphosphor formula. LED bulbs are far worse. The best lights are color proofing 90+CRI T5/T8 fluorescents or halogens (solux for example) if you can stand the heat output. Properly installed lighting with a 60-80% indirect component (bounced off the ceiling for example) any room gets a hell of a lot more comfortable. http://www.labs21century.gov/pdf/bp_lighting_508.pdf

Comment Re:Whatever happened to supply and demand (Score 1) 440

Does not apply. There is an unlimited supply and demand is based largely on marketing budget and price in relation to similar products. Changes in demand (purchase demand, not including piracy demand) have not been proven to be connected (either positively or negatively) to piracy (where demand is based on both marketing budget and quality).

Comment Re:Good Luck with China (Score 1) 495

I agree; China is not going to change until IP law becomes important to them internally. When the Chinese decide that they want strong protection from themselves in the realm of IP law they will begin taking the international issues seriously. Same issue with developing nations blocking expansions to intellectual property treaties through the WIPO; As long as the country is not suffering from internal IP conflict/pressure it will not benefit from strong international IP law and compliance.

If I understand the history correctly, the USA didn't recognize international IP until it joined

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property in 1887 (for patents and to some extent trademarks and industrial design rights) http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ShowResults.jsp?lang=en&treaty_id=2

and

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works in 1989 (for copyrights) http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ShowResults.jsp?lang=en&treaty_id=15

Note that these dates are 100 years apart. Also note the 100/200 years between 1790 when USA IP law was established and the joining of relevant conventions. China's non-compliance is not very different practically from the USA's many generations of non-recognition. However, China is part of the mentioned treaties which could indicate that eventual compliance is not likely. And I realize that international enforcement was probably almost impossible until recently anyway.

Slashdot Top Deals

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...