Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Yes (Score 4, Insightful) 698

Yes. Further, the point of the 2nd amendment was to equip the population to throw off tyranny. Any and all arms effective for that purpose seem covered by intent. Even ordnance, which was provided by private owners to fight the British. The intent being, specifically, to be able to fight a government.

Comment Re:4/5 in favor (Score 1) 755

No, this is not correct. In any market, if you set a floor or ceiling on prices, the result is a surplus or shortage. This is microeconomics 101. Market price is the intersection of supply and demand. Interfere with the market's ability to have supply and demand intersect, and the market is not cleared to equilibrium. See the chart.

Comment Re:4/5 in favor (Score 1) 755

As to "stealing to eat", I never said that either. You're making stuff up, whole cloth, to create straw men. It's getting rather tiresome.

I'm sorry, did I misinterpret this:

Unless people have something like a guaranteed income to make sure they can actually attend education instead of having to try to find a job or resort to crime, nothing.

Since kids aren't allowed to work in the USA, I only assumed "resorting to crime" meant you thought kids were engaged in crime instead of being at school. What did you actually mean, then?

First of all, what is your theory for why they are not in school?

I think it's a cultural problem with many, many factors (whole books worth). Lack of economic prospects is certainly one of them, but not the only one. FYI My spouse worked in low-income school districts for 5 years. A lot of what goes on to prevent successful child development is behavior by the parent(s) that doesn't have any direct tie to finances.

Tune society so that education and work provides status for them instead and see the the turnaround.

If people sincerely do not believe work is a good idea, that is ineffective. As the child told my spouse when she explained that she and I work to pay for our food, "then you be fool".

Comment Re:4/5 in favor (Score 1) 755

Huh? You broke the pattern.

I hear a lot of people implying that a higher minimum wage somehow forces "evil corporations" to "pay their fair share" without actually addressing the reality of a minimum wage that exceeds the exchanged labor value. Why would an employer want to hire somebody at $15.00/hr who's only making them $7.00/hour??

Comment Re:4/5 in favor (Score 2) 755

what is wrong with having people who are accepting of the fact that society does not produce enough jobs for everyone?

That's hard to parse, so I'm not sure what you mean. But assuming there's a societal obligation to "produce enough jobs for everyone" might be a stumbling point, as it asserts without proof that "society" can perform the necessary economic calculations to do so, and has a collective moral obligation to do so. That's not the least bit clear.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Everyone's head is a cheap movie show." -- Jeff G. Bone

Working...