Comment Re:This is Important to Discuss (Score 1) 68
Understand that "democracy" isn't a bunch of enlightened hipsters with progressive views deciding policy
There are enlightened hipsters?
Understand that "democracy" isn't a bunch of enlightened hipsters with progressive views deciding policy
There are enlightened hipsters?
I work for a municipality
You've got some balls to admit you work for the government on this thread, buddy!
As to "stealing to eat", I never said that either. You're making stuff up, whole cloth, to create straw men. It's getting rather tiresome.
I'm sorry, did I misinterpret this:
Unless people have something like a guaranteed income to make sure they can actually attend education instead of having to try to find a job or resort to crime, nothing.
Since kids aren't allowed to work in the USA, I only assumed "resorting to crime" meant you thought kids were engaged in crime instead of being at school. What did you actually mean, then?
First of all, what is your theory for why they are not in school?
I think it's a cultural problem with many, many factors (whole books worth). Lack of economic prospects is certainly one of them, but not the only one. FYI My spouse worked in low-income school districts for 5 years. A lot of what goes on to prevent successful child development is behavior by the parent(s) that doesn't have any direct tie to finances.
Tune society so that education and work provides status for them instead and see the the turnaround.
If people sincerely do not believe work is a good idea, that is ineffective. As the child told my spouse when she explained that she and I work to pay for our food, "then you be fool".
Huh? You broke the pattern.
I hear a lot of people implying that a higher minimum wage somehow forces "evil corporations" to "pay their fair share" without actually addressing the reality of a minimum wage that exceeds the exchanged labor value. Why would an employer want to hire somebody at $15.00/hr who's only making them $7.00/hour??
what is wrong with having people who are accepting of the fact that society does not produce enough jobs for everyone?
That's hard to parse, so I'm not sure what you mean. But assuming there's a societal obligation to "produce enough jobs for everyone" might be a stumbling point, as it asserts without proof that "society" can perform the necessary economic calculations to do so, and has a collective moral obligation to do so. That's not the least bit clear.
"Everyone's head is a cheap movie show." -- Jeff G. Bone