>>>The sherman...monopolies...unreasonably restricts trade

That's NOT the question I asked. The question I asked was: Which law prevents a corporation from "spreading FUD about patent infringement"? Quote it to me. Please and thank you.

>>>If Opera respected Apple's "Parental Control" settings

they'd be a sellout.

Never bow to the man. Besides I don't see other browsers like Firefox or Safari being penalized with this "adults only" disclaimer.

>>>I have no problem with peoples' identities being sought

Also makes it easier to throw the formerly-Anonymous persons in jail for things like ----- sharing how to crack a PS3 to install linux or media-watching software ----- producing art or comic books filled with nude teenagers doing what teenagers do (sex) ----- uploading a copy of Streamboat Willie --- et cetera.

Liberty cannot live in a world where people can not hide.

The right to be Publish Anonymously is protected by the Ninth Amendment. This judge is just a government tyrant trying to suppress the liberty of the People. Send him to the same place Saddam Hussein and Mubarak went.

(whispers)

Her kid, you want Opera? It comes installed for free on half of VirginMobile's phones. Go check it out and tell all your friends.

I've been patient with Apple up to this point, despite their heavy-handedness.

But this is the last straw. This is not merely an error, but an ANTI-COMPETITIVE AND therefore ILLEGAL practice designed to harm the Opera company. Maybe the US DOJ should leave MPEG alone and sue Apple Store instead.

Out of practice? Hardly.

The 2004 DOJ didn't have any problem going after the CD Cartel (for price-fixing), and forcing them to refund money to overcharged customers.

>>>What they're not allowed to do (and what spurred this investigation) is to spread FUD about patent infringement

Really???
Which law prevent a corporation from doing that? Quote it to me.
Please and thank you.

A desire to protect one's patented product from being copied (example: Apple going after Hackintosh clone manufacturers) is not indicative of a Monopoly or abuse of said monopoly. It's simply defense of one's work/intellectual property from being stolen.

This DOJ investigation simply has no basis to exist.

>>>Muslims are normal people that just happen to believe something differently than you do.

"Wrongthought"

It's not just a 1984 idea - it dates all the way back to the ~1100 AD crusades. The only justification for those wars was because muslims thought the "wrong" ideas, and therefore they needed to die. No wonder they hate Europeans & Americans - they still desire revenge for the injustices done to Arabs long ago.

".....remove the heads from thy enemies....." - Qor'an

Damn.

Skip eating lunch today, and "make up" for the loss.

>>>they busted Thomas Jefferson for impregnating Sally Hemmings

"busted"? Really? Are white men not allowed to have sex with black women (or vice-versa)? How colonial of you. --- From what illustrations I've seen, Sally was a gorgeous woman and I would have sex with her too. (With her permission of course - I'm too submissive to force someone to do something they don't want.)

If a free country, the agents responsible would already be tarred-and-feather by the People (from which all legitimate authority derives).

Constitution:

"We, the People of the State of Maryland..... declare: That all Government of right originates from the People, is founded in compact only, and instituted solely for the good of the whole; and they have, at all times, the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their Form of Government in such manner as they may deem expedient."

You sound like my art teacher, after I showed her video of cops beating an innocent jogger walking his dog. "I'm sure the cops had a good reason to beat him."

Riiight. More likely the cops (fbi) are Sick with power, and they do these things simply because they can, not because the citizen did anything wrong.

"Losers weepers; finders keepers." "Posession is nine-tenths of the laws," and so on. Balls thrown into my yard become my property - same applies with GPS devices found in my driveway.

The FBI would simply have to follow "the due process of law" if they wanted their discarded item back. I'm sure that would be most embarassing and reveal things they'd rather not reveal, but then I guess they shouldn't have left the GPS in my yard.

Dicks.