How something like about this:

#!/usr/bin/perl
($murderer1, $murderer2) = ('Wolfgang Werlé' , 'Manfred Lauber');
($guy1, $guy2) = (\$murderer1, \$murderer2);
print WIKIPEDIA "$guy1 and $guy2 killed a German actor in 1990";

I just finished watching the second season premiere episode of Fringe. This sounds completely plausible. In fact, I'm surprised they didn't expect this result.

How is this notable, again?

The Mac Box Set, available from the Apple store, costs $169. But keep in mind that for that price you're also getting iWork and iLife, which together cost $158. That's a pretty good deal.

http://www.gnu.org/software/groff/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groff_(software)

I think a better requirement would be to prominently display the amount of their and others' money the Scientologists have siphoned off them.

Your argument is flawed. See the following:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selma_to_Montgomery_marches

There are many more examples of the successful employment of satyagraha to effect change.

I don't have to defend satyagraha. It played a historically accepted, defining role both in the liberation of India and in the US Civil Rights movement under Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Your straw man attack on Gandhi is irrelevant to the discussion, but you may certainly be right about the world being a darker place had the Allies not fought violently against the Axis in the Second World War.

However, my point in my original post stands: violence is not the only means by which one people may impose its will on another, and the very idea of effecting such an imposition can be considered offensive to a reasonable person.

If you're referring to the United States government, then it may be more correct to say "a set of people forcing its will on itself." That's how our republic works.

And that system is user-configurable.

The aggrieved in such a conflict has more than one option, at least one of which--satyagraha--is both effective and nonviolent. In that light I agree with you that force must be met with a counter-force. But if you mean that the only way to resist violence is with more violence, I strongly disagree.

The notion that it's a good idea or even possible for one set of people to force its will on another is what leads to war, and it's one we might do well to change.

"Very well. You may expect to be the first to be sucked into our singularity. MWAHAHAHAHAHA!"

0 stays 0. It's a digit-for-digit substitution.

You'd be correct.

False.