Turned off politics?
Are you kidding??
Please look at all the topics that have had the highest number of posts on Slashdot (especially over the last four years); you'll find that they are usually political.
I personally prefer to give such topics a hard pass, as they're usually people agreeing with each other, or people shouting past each other, with few insights to be gained.
These are compelling only if users feel that doing all these is such a hassle that switching to EVs is desirable.
Given that people are creatures of habit, I wouldn't bet on it.
If you live in a country where you can't trust the electoral system, then even assuming that blockchain technology would introduce more trust, what is the incentive for any party that might become the ruling party (and thus benefit from the status quo) to introduce the technology?
It's very obvious from the way things were going that this was going to happen, so this is really filler news - up there with "It's the Xth anniversary of Y" and "It's X holiday today".
The real news is when the number of infected people begin to drop worldwide, or when governments start lifting their lockdowns.
Wow! That is quite a dizzying array of battery technologies.
I wonder which ones will eventually dominate the market...
I'd say that's more of a 'lack of knowledge' than a 'lack of intelligence' problem.
I looked at samples of chats that humans had had with it, here:
https://github.com/google-rese...
I think that its strength is that it can easily cross-reference data related to topics that a human brings up, and this allows it to open up the conversation.
Now that most smartphones don't have headphone jacks...
Where did they get that from? The vast majority of smartphone users do not use top-of-the-range phones that dispense with headphone jacks.
What are you talking about? This isn't some random blogger off the web, it's an executive from Cruise Automation.
They are literally working on making this happen, not just hoping something magically appears out of thin air.
So he should just keep on doing what he's doing, if he believes it's the right and profitable thing to do. There's no need to make any statement - if he's right, then his actions should ultimately speak louder than his words.
I am not sure what the point of making this statement is. Is it that nobody agrees with him, and nobody is committing people and resources to make self-driving cars a reality already? Just saying this isn't going to make self-driving cars magically appear out of the air; it's a hard problem to solve.
Given that there is no hard definition of a political ad, I bet that a lot of political advertisers will start creating a lot of bots which post thinly veiled advertising as comments.
Their talent is more useful down here than up there.
What they don't explain is how they're supposed to do this
If an admin does not need JIT privileges to authorize another admin to perform a task, there's no need for this 'endless loop'.
"Podcasts" are just an mp3 or a streaming mp3. Why the hell would anybody need an "app" for that? Just go to the damn web page and click the link.
An app makes it easier for you to discover and manage several podcasts that you are interested in, and do this management/discovery in one place. An app also provides a consistent experience for playing or rewinding podcasts, and you can even combine episodes from multiple podcasts into a single playlist.
Of course, if you don't listen to many podcasts, or listen infrequently, then it's perfectly fine visiting the website to listen.
UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker