ChatCPT: I can make things up George Santos: hold my beer

I guess the instructors and students were to blame for her father's firing.

Pay up or I will ruin you

You tell that to the recreational hunters and fishermen. It's a sport.

Not if only the the winner of catching the most, or the longest is awarded. No one is going to breed these pythons and release them to the wild just to have a chance to win $1500. Captive breeding is not an option because these pythons have to eat too, and will probably cost more than the award to raise them.

Sure, commit a team to a non-standardize language that can change on a whim. That's a lot of problems CoffeeScript is going to help solve. In the mean time, I have just invented a superior language called CrapScript that compiles into native CoffeeScript. You should use it.

What's wrong is that jQuery is NOT CoffeeScript. In the computer science world, someone (must) come along to invent a new language to satisfy his own inflated ego. If I take a wild guess, I'd say that behind all the mumble jumbo, putting his name on a language, and eventually publishing a book about it is the real motivation.

At the store checkout, stick out your back of your palm to the cashier. The cashier stamps your hand, and you take the goods. Next time you go to a bank, pay the bank and the bank teller rubs off the stamp on your hand. Transaction complete. No wallets required.

Thinking outside of the box -- why put condom inside a mobile phone? Put your mobile phone inside layers of condoms. just peel one off each time you need one. as a side benefit, it makes your phone instantly waterproof.

If by means of intelligence, we are talking about lifeforms that invent religion, and would dedicate their lives killing each other because it's god's will, then no, dolphins and whales don't fit the bill. If this is how intelligent lifeforms should be, then any extraterritorial beings that are like us but are (more) intelligent probably don't exist anymore.

or in the 2012 presidential bid

su - {nis_username}

The principles sound good. In practice, things are done by conventions. Special method and member names for example. There is no access level modifiers, and as a result, every member, whether it is a method or a data in a class is public. Encapsulation is not enforced by the language. In fact, object data, methods, even class meta information is managed by dictionary. Any client who gets hold of a reference of a class can dynamically change it. To me, it *IS* a flexible language, but is often abused by creative python coders. My experience with python is that it is very easy to learn and to write, but hell to read if it is written by others.

no, by turning them into good looking mannequins.

Ur... how is Python any less different? It's one of the most easily abused, badly written language because it is so flexible. There is practically no rule with Python.