Now for an analogy: If I didn't mow my property for 20 years, and your kids grew up playing on it without me saying a word about it. Would they be able to visit that property any time they wanted as adults? Do your grandkids automatically get to use it too. Now I put up a fence, and call the cops on your grand kids for trespassing. Would I be a total dick? Would I have a legal right to do so? (yes and probably)
Wrong!, there is something called "adverse possession". If someone has used a piece of land long enough, made changes and it has clearly been in use without you acknowledging or responding to their use. The land may become theirs by law. http://www.beliveaulaw.net/201...
This is true. The Chinese import technology, not products. As soon as they have the technology they don't need your products anymore. Access to markets in China is abysmal at best. Though, the US is not the only country facing this issue with China, and the US is not in a trade war "just" with China. All of the free market countries that would have unilaterally agreed with us going after China are now more likely to side with China in this war.
US, and us against the world is not a strategy. If Trump wanted to go after all of these trade deficits, then the oldest simplest strategy is to divide and conquer. First go after China with European help, and then deal with Europe. China's ability to hold out is completely dependent on their markets outside the US, if we had worked with our other partners to cut them off, this would have been much simpler. What Trump is doing is bound to hurt the US more than the outside world in the long run because either our ex-trading partners will find other suppliers or our suppliers will move overseas to meet the demand. The US does not have the ability to artificially support all of our own exporters that will be hurt by this. In the end it's a crap shoot whether or not we lose more in lost markets for US producers than we gain in lowered tariffs on products that China may or may not import at all.
285 is really stretching it. This is a list of "all" Linux distros, that covers everything from x86 to Arm and even Risc and PowerPc processors as well as BSD distros. Most of the distros are just repackaged versions of two or three main distros with not much more than a new theme added. Very little is different after you pass the first few.
The fact is that Windows has suffered for years without any competition. The fact that they can make a turd sandwich and you'd eat it is why the OS has not gotten noticeably better.
Personally I still don't get the issue with windows updates. Yes I know you can have it update at night, then wake up to needing to reboot and install more only to have to leave for work before you can check your email and then come home to have to click another checkbox that takes another length of time at least as long as a full install before you can use it. All because NTFS still has no reasonable way to deal with inodes in memory. Seriously, no other OS has that problem. Right now I have windows install on a disk that won't upgrade because of circular dependency issues. You know the problem you claim Linux has, which it doesn't because installing concurrent versions of libraries is done all the time for all kinds of software.
I don't feel like reinstalling windows because my Linux system works so well, and doesn't have all those issues. Unless of course your talking about not being able to run really expensive proprietary software that you need to buy and relicense every couple of years.. so what.
I've been using Linux since 1997, on a 386. My first attempt was slackware, my second was redhat, and my 3rd wash mandrake (which finally got my 64k baud modem working
Often when using Windows I'd wake in the morning to check the news only to be looking at a blue update screen.. then wait, and wait and go to work, then come home and click "ok" then wait and wait. This still goes on with Windows 10. Something stupid about losing inode markers while re-installing so that programs in memory can't access the original file (which they could have fixed by now) but I digress.
Linux has no real virus threats, no serious malware issues, Has all of your basic desktop software available at your fingertips on install, for free, doesn't lock up your system when it upgrades and worst case scenario you can re-install the latest version for free in less than an hour if everything goes wrong.
Those people who say that Linux is too hard to use just have never used it long enough to get it. In the long run you'll spend far less time working on your Linux system and far more time using it then you ever did with Windows. My current install on an amd 8320 still boots up in 20 seconds or less after over a year. Prove to me that your windows install does the same thing with as little maintenance as I've put into this (other than upgrades) none
Money will say more in one moment than the most eloquent lover can in years.