Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:200 megabytes!? (Score 1) 33

3 billion letters, four possibilities per letter. That's only 1.5 gigabit of data, roughly 200 megabytes.
Then the entropy seems to be limited because of repeating sequences.
Looks like our "design files" are not that complicated as I thought.
How many humans would fit on a compressed archive on a 32gig thumbstick.
Guess this falls under the category "a fool can ask more questions in an hour than a wise man can answer in seven years"

Am I missing something in your math.
4 possibilities per letter is 2 bits per letter, thus 3 billion letters is 6 billion gigabit (roughly). That's around 800 MB.

Comment Free market? (Score 5, Insightful) 123

Isn't the gig economy all about a free market? DoorDash is free to encourage (not force) their employees/contractors/drivers to accept lower paying deliveries in exchange for a title of dubious value. The DeclineNow group is free to encourage (not force) their fellow drivers to decline those lower paying deliveries in the hopes of driving up the pay per delivery.

In the end, the individual driver is free to choose whether they are better off accepting an offered fee for a given delivery or declining in hopes that a better paying delivery comes along. It may or may not, depending on what other drivers in the area are willing to accept and how many there are. Likewise, DoorDash is free to decide whether the current delivery times are acceptable at their current pay per delivery or whether they need to encourage faster acceptance of a delivery by offering more money for it.

In practice, both DoorDash and a moderately savy driver will be watching average delivery times and prices and choose for their own situation whether or not to make a deal for the given delivery at the given price.

Comment Doesn't this have an easy fix? (Score 1) 27

Can't you not run the CI tests until a project admin approves a change? I'm not talking about a final approval, but just an initial "this is worth spending the cpu resources to test" approval. For large projects, this might be problematic, but could be filtered to require that first-time contributors require approval before the CI stuff runs automatically.

Comment Re:Electric heat is anti-efficient, could be minin (Score 1) 355

Some of that is opportunity cost. If using a bitcoin rig offsets my heat cost to the tune of $20/month, I have an incentive to buy a bitcoin rig instead of a space heater. However, my space heater only costs me $20. That bitcoin rig costs me $3000. It takes me 150 months (more than 10 years) to recover my cost. That bitcoin rig will not be offsetting my heat costs nearly as much that far down the road.

Now, if someone were to provide me a bitcoin heater for free (or cheap) in exchange for a much lower offset (say $2/month), maybe that's a thing worth doing.

Comment Re:'Big by Itself Is Not Bad' (Score 3, Insightful) 39

For years, I have said, Microsoft is a Marketing and Sales company not a tech company. Tech is just the vehicle that gets them to their goals.

I don't disagree with you. However, I'm wondering if the same can't be said of any company. At least any company that remains profitable.

Comment Re:Poor example (Score 1) 451

Putting in a roundabout uses a lot more space for intersections that rarely have more than 2 cars meet. It also is a lot more costly than just adding 4 signs.

Uh, you do realize that, in situations like that in Europe, they just paint a circle on the road and put up roundabout signs, right?

So, I've never been to Europe, so I wasn't aware of that. In a few intersections near me that might work.

For most in my area though, that isn't a workable solution. The intersections are small enough that some larger cars can't do a 360 turn with out either jumping a curb or backing up and making it at least a 3-point turn. A large truck (think moving truck or school bus) would have no chance. Moving the curbs to expand the intersection requires moving utility lines and in some cases getting dangerously close to existing structures. For low-traffic roads it's just not worth it.

Comment Re:Poor example (Score 1) 451

It does raise another interesting point though. What is it that US road designers have with four way stops? They place them everywhere, while the rest of the world happily gives bigger roads priority and use yields to allow traffic from side roads to merge. If the roads are very similar in traffic volume, use a roundabout.

In the US, a lot of roads in residential areas were built with no signage whatsoever. The rule at an intersection with no signs is equivalent to a 4-way yield. Basically the right-of-way rules of a 4-way stop with out the requirement to stop even when nobody else is around. However, that leads to accident-prone behavior. People tend to just drive through assuming anyone from the other directions is yielding to them.

With out a clear "main" and "side" street, a lot of cities then added 4-way stop signs. They are relatively cheap and solve the problem effectively. Putting in a roundabout uses a lot more space for intersections that rarely have more than 2 cars meet. It also is a lot more costly than just adding 4 signs.

I will grant you that seeing a 4-way stop at an intersection that regularly sees a lot of traffic is a problem. So is a 4-way stop where each direction has two through lanes and a turn lane for each left and right. Many areas of the US are in fact replacing 4-way stops in high-traffic intersections with roundabouts or lights.

Submission + - Source for how good a company is to work for?

Elros writes: Is there a good online source (ideally user-driven) that rates how good a tech company is to work for? A lot of real information about a company's culture and work environment isn't available until at least the interview if not some time in to working there.

Slashdot Top Deals

Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.

Working...