Comment Self defined Standards (Score 1) 56
WHO set the standard and why?
WHO set the standard and why?
My prediction is that ChatGTP will be a political correct and safe enterprise service because OpenAI has a heavy focus on sanitizing ChatGTP's output. This will not satisfy people who do not want to live in a bubble, who will seek alternatives like Grok. In the end all LLMs will be on par and people will subscribe to the one which fits ones personality.
Or actually make suggestions I actually like instead of pushed local music (to which I never listen to) just because my credit card is from that country.
Am I missing something here? The study you absolved (or not) could not get you a job which earned enough money to pay back your student loan. Also, you chose a school which asks an enormous amount of money so they can have classes which are useless on the job market.
Now this all has to be paid for by the tax paying population who did choose a solid career path. Doesn't sound really fair.
If you are not in- or exhaling all the air through the mask then part of the viruses get in or out. So at percentage if the mask working? Can you get Covid only from at least 1000 viruses or is 1 already enough to start replicating?
I wondered the same thing, I didn't realize the genre was so popular. I thought most of them played World of Tanks.
Either "journalists" invest most of their time in witty word plays or are just dumb as fuck.... or both.
I still don't know why the world hasn't moved on to the standardized banana scale. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes...
I used it to calculate how much Corona vaccines were distributed. It has been a while since I did the calculation but at the time it ended up in 8 Olympic swimming pools of vaccine liquid world wide. Just imagine all those doctors dumping their little injections into a pool until 8 of them are full.
I am so allergic to ads that I'll actively avoid buying products from companies who waste my time with ads. I hope my kind of people also pop up in the PKIs they'll use to evaluate if this is a good idea or not.
I don't care much about short term effects like 110 days of sickness, I am more scared of a lifelong reduced heart capacity from a severe case of myocarditis.
Same here. People are very bad at statistics. All the time I hear as an argument that "I had" or "a friend of mine" did this "and he was fine". That is not an argument if the said thing is safe.. I mean, people surviving Russian Roulette wouldn't (I hope) say that it is a safe sport to practice, now would they?
And you know what was the hardest thing to get during the pandemic? Reliable data. Practically all data was fucked up or biased. A great basis to make up your own mind.
If they hate humans so much why then don't try try to exterminate all humans from the planet just to save "the earth"? Nuclear bombs would to the trick, just a wait a couple of million years for the plutonium to half-life away and presto, no more humans and only animals. With a bit of luck we get another 100 million year reign of dinosaurs.
Or is the real reason that those activists only want to save themselves?
The only thing I need from a browser is how effective it is in stopping ads, pop-ups and personal information syphoning. Really, without AdblockPlus I would stop using WWW alltogether.
Sometimes I happen to "enjoy" a browser without an adblocker and each time it was a harsh reminder of how ad bloated WWW has become. So for me browser speed is worthless if it is only used to speed up the amount of ads I'm seeing, how fast I get pop-ups or cookie consent questions and how fast the websites are tracking me.
I totally agree but I see a reason why they approach it this way: "Cell phone detection cameras" have to be paid by the government but the proposed doohickies have to be paid by you.
Last mile. The consumer connection is always the limiting factor. Unless of course you have a crap ISP.
Somebody ought to cross ball point pens with coat hangers so that the pens will multiply instead of disappear.