Newsflash: The sea floor is spacious. Very very spacious.

If a test could be devised that African's can do better on than Caucasians on average it would have. It has actually been attempted with pretty much the same results. Thus such a test remains one of the mythical creatures in liberals' bag of wishful thinking arguments. To the above poster who says IQ is a crappy measure: by all means please provide another measure then. How about actual results, such as advancements in technology? I am part African but on the end of the bell curve that can recognize reality.

By golly if we can put a laser for communicating in space we should be able to put a laser for communicating on a cell phone!

I give you: http://theplayzer.com/

I have cookies turned on and therefore serve them up. Wouldn't that alone qualify as server activity?

NO SIMPLER: No one person should have so much knowledge and access to secret data.

A good place to start would be on all of the federal highway signs.

I am a developer who also has some experience paying other developers for a project. I do not agree with some of the criticism you are getting. If you say up front you won't pay for bugs then the developer should not accept the work if they don't want to work under those conditions. It is easy to say "all code has bugs" but it is also true that cleaner and well thought out code will have less bugs and the more unit testing that is done on code the less bugs it will have. Why reward sloppy behavior? Nothing wrong with getting developers to own it. The project I subbed out was a fixed priced project. Bugs and omissions were plentiful, and although I wish the developers were more careful, at the end of the day it was their own time that they were expending on fixes.

Regardless wouldn't the easiest way to find the best search engine optimizer would be to just do a google search for them. If they come up on the first page as a non-paid ad you can be pretty sure they know their stuff.

Simple Evidence that Corn for Fuel is NOT WORTH IT: One of the knocks on ethanol is increased distribution costs. Yet when and if used for fuel at the point of production there are no distribution issues. Yet why is it than none of the corn to ethanol plants actually run on ethanol? They all run on fossil fuels.

And of course the energy used to manufacture them is free as well.

Also what about the distribution of letters? I say one less U and one more S !!!

His methodology could be enhanced. Letters C and V should be bumped up as well since the fact that they cannot be made into 2 letter words often makes them less useful and harder to play.

The two most commonly used questions for a company I used to be a developer for were "What is your favorite color?" and "What is your favorite number?". I tried telling them that they should not be using questions for which most answers would fall within a very small range. But they didn't seem to want to change them.

Can't name a corn-to-ethanol plant that runs on ethanol either.

The greatest harm is not really from questionable patents being awarded, but from them being upheld by the courts.