Comment Re:Problem isn't wind or solar (Score 1) 132
As you point out, it depends on the plant. In our case, nameplate rating is 750 MW on each unit, and they can run for extended periods at 200-250 MW, so 30% or so.
I am not adverse to expanding renewable power, but the real problem at this point is still backup power. Wind/solar/hydro are not always available at anything approaching rated full load. Without either viable storage systems or fossil-fuel/nuclear backup, there are going to be times when there is just not enough power in a region, and there is not enough inter-grid power transfer (in the US) to make up the difference. People are not going to like being in the cold and dark for extended periods.
I am not adverse to expanding renewable power, but the real problem at this point is still backup power. Wind/solar/hydro are not always available at anything approaching rated full load. Without either viable storage systems or fossil-fuel/nuclear backup, there are going to be times when there is just not enough power in a region, and there is not enough inter-grid power transfer (in the US) to make up the difference. People are not going to like being in the cold and dark for extended periods.