Comment Re:What that really means? (Score 2) 371
typepad.com or nasa.gov. Pick the one you think is most trustworthy on science issues.
(http://climate.nasa.gov/)
typepad.com or nasa.gov. Pick the one you think is most trustworthy on science issues.
(http://climate.nasa.gov/)
Well, you can take for instance the side of the 1300 scientists that made the report that's cited here: http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/. Or the 3146 surveyed here: http://articles.cnn.com/2009-01-19/world/eco.globalwarmingsurvey_1_global-warming-climate-science-human-activity.
But these guys are all funded by some organization that wants people to recycle, right?
FFS: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
Or don't you trust these guys either?
Honestly, I think you should have kept that to yourself, because on second thought it doesn't make much sense. Nostradamus' "predictions" are incredibly ambiguous, which is why they can be made fit observations after the fact. Quantities such as degrees Celcius/Fahrenheit are not; the observations either fit within the specified level of precision or not.
Yep. On both sides. This is why both sides have zero credibility with the other. Both sides call the others lying bastards, and for a vocal minority on both sides, they are right.
I'm curious. Who do you think is funding the side that's supported by 90% of climate scientists worldwide?
...denying ideas widely held by entire scientific and academic communities...
Please elaborate. I'm very interested to hear what the scientific and academic community has to say about climate change.
Nope
On a side note: *uuutiiiniii*
If by best, you mean adequate, the answer would be nobody. But I guess AT&T would be least worst (at least when I was last there).
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I'm sure Apple had a bucket load of old Motorola pagers in the room when they were designed the push software for the iPhone.
Thank you (again) Poland.
The reverse argument is equally ridiculous:
Nothing we do can combined cause global scale changes on the planet, which is nice, because then I can keep doing whatever I want.
The worst part is that very little is required to make very large impacts on carbon emissions. If everyone in the US bought a car that had half the horsepower that the car they currently own has, they could make a huge impact on their emissions.
Let's roll the dice so we don't have to be inconvenienced by sorting our garbage and driving cars with smaller engines.
Nananananananana, Bribeman!
Aaaaaany minute now.
So you're saying Windows ME and Vista was on purpose?
Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger
