Well Android has good legacy support, so I'm not sure what their incompatibility problems are, besides cheap Androids that just aren't well made (you get what you pay for).

Astroturfing, like this summary for example.

Android doesn't infringe on patents.

Is this a serious fucking argument?

You can use Android apps without Android. Fuck off.

Well, yeah. If you want the functionality and it's not built in, you have to find someone else who wrote a solution or do it yourself. dumb fuck

what an ignorant comment. how was this modded up to 5?

I like how everyone is assuming YouTube is a profitable website. Google's doing the internet a service keeping it up.

Well, the whole "own vs. license" thing means I'm not completely wrong, and I'm not going to disregard that argument because it works nicely for you. You're licensing ebooks off Amazon, not buying the ebook file. They make this clear in the EULA. If you don't like it (and I don't either), then choose another epublisher.

They were hosting illegal content. I know it's nice to get outraged about (especially because of the books banned), but you're picking a fight.

If you want some idea, you could go look at "Top Grossing" in the market. Or you can keep asking rhetorical questions ;D

Obviously providing the means to download relatively small files is cheaper than manufacturing and shipping books, so good thing something might be done about it.

http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/5/2612610/dell-were-not-backing-away-from-android

I feel like whenever that tablet is mentioned in reply to iPad-praising posts, it goes right over the Apple aficionados' heads.

Id say 0% due to slashdot, nerds are already pissed at them for it regardless of apology.