Precisely

Can you relate your assertion to the timeline, please? The claims of demonstrations, the video, the jailing of Nakula Nakula, all belie everything you're saying. It is simply the case that the public amnesia upon which a fourth-rate banana republic regime like that of Obama relies to retain power is not working in this case. The overwhelming suspicion that good men were callously left to die in combat is going to require a thorough, detailed, non-Duranty-Award-Winning investigation.
Interestingly, the one making faith-based claims here seems to be you: that Obama may be innocent, that the NYT and Senate investigations were more than so many soiled diapers, that the Left can, with some combination of shrill cries and running out the clock, manage to outrun getting "The Stevens". Are you really some kind of Lovecraft reference, trying to hold sanity together while Cthulhu gnaws?

In what way, precisely? Why do you fear facts? Do you work as a SysAdmin at the IRS, where you think that people are going to buy off that you "lost" two years of email for, what is it now, SEVEN key employees?
It's demonstrably true that the American people are kinda stupid, having re-elect #OccupyResoluteDesk. I guess you are given little choice but to continue having faith in that stupidity.

See, here's the crazy part: we want to know the 5 Ws of what led up to the Benghazi disaster, and the actual play-by-play of what our Commander-at-Golf was doing that night, in lieu of his job.
Given that Socialists seem to be kinda gutless, spineless gelatin, the hope is that the facts can be a sufficient monument to our past stupidity that we Never. Elect. Such. A. Tool. AGAIN. We could set about reform, prosperity, and avoid a third world fate for all races, creeds, orientations, &c. We've just got to get Oedipus to lift the curse on Thebes.

No, that's all you.

Only you are claiming this. Reasonable men know that there are men capable of personal action, and those placing the medals on men capable of personal action. Ever seen Saving Private Ryan? Obama is the guy who stands there, paralyzed, holding the bandoliers of .50cal, while men die.

You know precisely what I mean, my sweet propaganda monger.

Wait. What planet were you on, again?

I also did not believe anyone was stupid enough to believe a godforsaken word of Obama's. Lesson: never, never underestimate the power of sycophants.

Why should we make up anything, when we can have a proper trial, put the appropriate people under oath, and get the facts out? Your only achievement in any of this is to underscore the Streisand Effect.
And I would like to announce boredom with this talking past each other. Not sure how much more time I can devote to re-iterating the truth to you.

How would the absolute nature of innocence be affected in any way by a trial, if one were innocent?

Which is not the same thing as saying you know the President to be innocent.

One obvious way is to note that, were any of the previous whitewashings, in fact, adequate, there would not be further investigations.

Our political system has never seen the likes of the IRS suppression of dissent, and the Benghazi suppression of truth that have, unfortunately, clouded the outcome of the 2012 election. Precedent must be set, sir.

How shall I judge them disconnected? All I have is the river of prevarication that you represent, and I have to tell you that your every weasel word does nothing to support your cause.

I guess you'd have to confine yourself to simple, historically factual, dispassionate, balanced, collegial arguments. The Left spent the last decade carpet bombing Bush in particular, and conservatives in general, so badly with rhetoric. You won. You got the rodeo clown into office and re-elected. And now your rhetorical chickens are coming home to roost. It should indeed bother you that the Left's (politicians and media) countless false accusations of are called out and attacked. This IS racism, and it's done to divide Americans and amass power. Be honest about it; let's purge the country of falsehood, and build a meritocracy.

Help me understand how a man who is actually innocent could ever be guilty. Sure, there will always be liars who hurl accusations (see, for example, statements on this website by people you know) but innocence is an absolute state. It's almost as though you kind of suspect the President may be guilty, and you're more interested in gaming the system, as with unreliable investigations, than you are in proving innocence and providing justice for the slain.

I have not once done so. Let me double down. I have never once sought to manipulate your speech. In fact, I have never attempted to coerce directly anyone to say anything. Which is not the same as saying I've never encouraged honesty, nor attempted to get you to speak truthfully, nor failed to admit where I (in this JE thread, for example) have veered into inaccuracy. Integrity, dude: it's what's for breakfast. Not force feeding you, but do eat up. Please.

Are you in creative writing mode again? I assure you: I'm not (though it sounds as though you may be) talking about the Full Clinton.