Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Isn't it obvious? (Score 1) 254

Sure, government spending creates jobs. However, excepting deficit spending (which has a different price), the government is spending money that it took out of the economy. That money would otherwise be in circulation somewhere else.

It’s not only a matter of whether the money is still “in circulation,” but more how fast it’s circulating and what the money is doing while circulating. Tax breaks for the poor and middle class are clearly stimulative for the overall economy, as they tend to spend a much larger portion of any increase in cash than the rich.

The rich tend to spend a lower proportion of their marginal increases in wealth, tending to either hoard it or spend it on lavish luxuries that don’t benefit the overall economy as much. Money given to the rich doesn’t circulate as quickly, so effectively decreases the spending and investment in the overall economy.

The country trying to maximize its economic output and median population productivity should be taxing the wealthiest and either giving it to the poor and middle class or using it to benefit those sectors of the population in public programs.

Comment Re:Clutch those pearls! (Score 4, Insightful) 316

Neither one of them has any reaction time to speak of, and neither one of them should be on the road AT ALL. It doesn't matter how slow or fast you are going if it takes a full minute to process anything let alone react properly. I would add, ditto for cell phones.

Don't be ridiculous. Of course the speed matters. It matters to other drivers or pedestrians who have to react to any unexpected actions the intoxicated individual makes, and it makes a massive difference to the amount of damage/trauma inflicted.

Comment Re:Who actually pays the taxes? (Score 1) 255

I know it's popular to think that companies should pay their fair share, but the reality is that any taxes that are successfully levied on a company are simply passed on to their customers. So really it's all of us who pay those taxes anyway. If Amazon is forced to cough up more taxes they'll just raise prices by that same percent. Except for some sectors like agriculture that can't pass their costs on.

That's true for companies that are breaking even, working on razor thin margins. For Amazon, with huge margins and billions of dollars in profit each year, any taxes will almost certainly come out of company coffers or returns that would normally go to shareholders.

Comment Re:Not powerful enough to heckle? (Score 1) 255

I forgot that Amazon don't pay no stinkin' taxes.

In 2019, Amazon paid $162 million in income taxes, plus $9 Billion in Sales and Use taxes, and $2.4 Billion in payroll and customs taxes.

I'm pretty sure all of those are more in taxes than you personally paid to the tax collectors...

Amazon's net income in 2019 was about $14 BIllion. $162 Million is an absurdly low amount of tax to pay on that level of earnings. Sales taxes are paid for by the consumer. Amazon doesn't get credit for following the law in charging the consumer for those. Also, those are not federal taxes, but state and local, so not part of this discussion.

Comment Re: How Dare They (Score 1) 255

The real question, which is probably unanswerable, is whether Warren genuinely believed the story of her supposed heritage when she was benefiting from it. If she did, she's just a fool. If she didn't, then she's a thief and a fraud. I'm open to examining evidence that suggests the latter, but haven't seen any yet.

What I've noticed is that the same people who say "corporations aren't cheating, the tax code lets them avoid those taxes" are the people up in arms about Warren gaming the system. It's one or the other.

To be fair to Warren, the assumption that personal family history includes Native American heritage is widespread where she grew up in Oklahoma. Hell, the license plates have in various incarnations included either "Native American" or images of Native Americans for decades.

Comment Re:Scumbag Alert (Score 1) 67

Nah. Just another privileged person who is used to getting his way. Having coerced her for a second "date", he thought he was being clever by following up with more threats to keep her under his thumb.

She just had the good sense to realize that this was not going to stop, that even agreeing to the second meeting was an error, and that she had the most to lose by not shutting it down as soon as possible.

I'm not certain that privileged is the correct word though. I don't conflate privilege with being an utter asshole.

It's like not every white well to do male is screwing hookers, or a sexual criminal, despite today's narrative that we are.

Stupid criminal asshole is probably a better term.

He was a highly paid attorney. He's not "privileged"? There are lots of assholes, but this one was the lead attorney for a large industry lobbying organization. He certainly acted like he had privileges not accorded to us regular people.

Comment Re: Oh, goody. (Score 1) 139

KDE Konqueror.

KHTML (Konqueror) was first. Apple forked that to make Webkit. Google initially used Webkit and then forked Webkit to make Blink.

Blink powers Chrome/Chromium, Opera, and the future versions of Edge. It's based upon Webkit.

Webkit powers Safari. It's based on KHTML.

KHTML powers Konqueror. It's something the KDE team hacked together from chewing gum, old razor blades, and discarded coffee grinds.

Discarded coffee grinds powers Mr Coffee. They're based on coffee beans.

You see where this is going.

So all the browsers are java-based?

Comment Re:Vote count and election results not changed (Score 5, Informative) 778

Rosenstien added details from the podium ...

There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election results.

He's already charged and obtained guilty pleas from Americans in this investigation, just not in this particular indictment.

Determining any effect on the election was never in the purview of the Mueller investigation, just actions taken and the underlying intent. If you think a concerted misinformation campaign had no effect at all on voters, you are free to believe so. You are also free to believe and Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.

Slashdot Top Deals

Your program is sick! Shoot it and put it out of its memory.

Working...