Comment Re: sh*t is rolling down hill (Score 1) 179
Yes, they do. This doesn't mean being anti-family, it means that families are seen as means to the expansion of State power.
The traditional Marxist view on (bourgeoisie) families is that they maintain capitalism and the ruling class. In the case of today's neo-Marxism, this is quite expanded (see Theory) and the "bourgeoisie" seems to be anyone that disagrees with whichever variation of Critical Theory is being presented.
From the horse's mouth in the Communist Manifesto:
https://www.marxists.org/archi...
The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.
Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
