Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Won't Buy Sony Promises (Score 1) 49

Look, I paid for the feature. They just get to remove it? How does that make sense to anyone but Sony? It was built into the console. If they chose to sell at a loss, that's on them. It sets a dangerous precedent, right?

Second, as far as the piracy aspect, read here: SONY "YET TO IDENTIFY A SINGLE INSTANCE" OF OTHER OS PS3 PIRACY. Show me your source for the "people" who bragged about it online. Very much like complaining about voter fraud without evidence.

I am stunned this got downvoted but I guess that's where slashdot is these days.

Comment Won't Buy Sony Promises (Score 0) 49

In 2007, I was buying my first console, wrestling with XB vs PS3. The primary feature in my choosing the PS3 was their highly-touted "Other OS feature" that let one run an OS other than the Sony's--it was great. And then, around 2010, they arbitrarily and imperiously (because "reasons") released an "update" that completely removed the feature.

They claimed it was "voluntary" but if you DIDN'T install the update, you lost the ability to watch Blu-Ray DVDs or connect to the PS network (which was required for most games, even single-player.)

I will *NEVER* trust any product produced by Sony that can be "updated" into another bait-and-switch con.

Comment Re:In The News (Score 5, Insightful) 192

Yeah. The consumers are all drones, anyway. Seriously, I have been eyeing the DJI line and was getting close to pulling the trigger on the Mavic Pro. Now, I will move on. There's no way I'll put up with crap like that. Plus, the drone market is quite full of high-quality alternatives. I certainly will not purchase from this Orwellian, fascist corporation. They are vastly underestimating their market and the consumers who buy their product. I'm sure it's a drop in the bucket to them but they just lost $1K (+ accessories) with this policy. NOT bending over.

Submission + - Paying for a Product That Becomes Useless (allrecipes.com)

cookiej writes: Back in the day, you bought something. You used this something for awhile and then it eventually wore out, became less useful or was replaced by something else.

I was one of the early purchases of the PS3. I bought it because at the time, it was the only console that openly supported Linux. It was a feature that figured heavily in my purchasing decision.

Sony decided it was too open, too easy to hack, so they removed access with a new update. Of course, I had warning and although if I did NOT install the update, the machine became useless for gaming. I was pissed that they would arbitrarily change the function of a product in my living room. But at that time, I DID have the "illusion" of the option not to do the update.

I work out of the house and do all the cooking for the family. I had scoured the net for online cooking tools way back when and settled on one called "AllRecipes". Using that site became integral to my cooking process. It was as much of a tool in my meal planning and delivery as the my pans, stove and thermapen. After a few months of using it daily, I paid for a "Pro" subscription and felt it was money well-spent.

The company announced a new version of the website was coming on Sept. 1. Previous updates have added features, cleaned up bugs, the usual things you expect. Come Sept. 1, the entire focus of the site changed. The change was so radical, it is pretty much unusable by the daily chef. Critical features were removed, others were made obscure and hard to find. Access to our recipes is incredibly hard. The system for sending a recipe via email (allowing a potential way to copy the recipes out of the system) has been "down" since the site went up. It has become a food-oriented Pinterest-wannabe. Essentially, a social-media food site. Not only that, but the "release" hardly qualifies as an Alpha release, it's so terrible.

Of course, many of the current users were up in arms and have complained to whomever will listen. But heck, it's a website and I'm sure somewhere in the legalese is some note about them owning all of our data and we have no rights to it, blah, blah...

But my question is more basic. I paid for access to this site through the end of the year. Some folks on the site have paid through 2017. How do we, as consumers (and developers,) address this sort of thing? Software is integral in our lives and how or what can be done to ensure that we get what we pay for?

Comment Re: On Its Way Out (Score 1) 221

One of the reasons Jobs did that was to cut ios users out of the huge library of free flash games on the web and force users and developers to the app store. That gaming library is still massively used and a primary driver for Flash use.

B.S.

It was well known that there were security holes you could drive a truck through. Jobs was the first (ok, maybe ONE of the first) high-profile tech leaders with the clout and guts to declare the Emperor Had No Security (as well as being a huge memory hog.)

I believe he cited (lookie me, ma! I done used it correctly!) statistics from OS X showing that Flash clearly was the #1 cause of their software crashes. And realize that not only was he proven right now, but he was proven right then. Not long after Jobs' dress-down of Flash, Adobe themselves gave up on making it for mobile, saying they could not make it work. There was a version for Android that was pathetic and they couldn't fix it.

So, while I'm sure Jobs' didn't feel bad about gamers having to use the app store instead of Flash, I doubt it was a major motivating factor in his rant. Jobs' perspective started with the user. He generally felt that if you give the user the right experience, the business and money will follow.

Of course, this is all bad news for Zynga...

Comment Re:ebola stigma (Score 1) 65

Apparently you skipped over the part where he was declared "ebola free" by the same group who are declaring him not contagious.

My issue is that this "cure" appeared recently and from my (admittedly layman's) perspective, it hasn't had enough time to prove it's completely effective. And given the risks involved if someone is wrong, it seems foolhardy to just trust that it will work.

And when I read that the doctors are "stumped" as to why the disease wasn't completely eliminated, it scares the hell out of me. This isn't AIDS. It's faster and far more easily and casually contracted. Not to be trifled with. Until people have been truly "Ebola free" and not contagious for years, I think precautions are warranted.

Submission + - FBI Slammed On Capitol Hill For 'Stupid' Ideas About Encryption (dailydot.com)

blottsie writes: At a hearing in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, the FBI endured outright hostility as both technical experts and members of Congress from both parties roundly criticized the law enforcement agency's desire to place so-called back doors into encryption technology.

"Creating a technological backdoor just for good guys is technologically stupid," said Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), a Stanford University computer science graduate. "That's just stupid."

Slashdot Top Deals

"Don't drop acid, take it pass-fail!" -- Bryan Michael Wendt

Working...