Not always. You can get a C&R FFL that doesn't allow you to sell your own firearms. In most cases, yes. Just not all. Cheers.

It's already legally settled. You CAN manufacture your own firearms provided it does not run afoul of NFA. You do not need an FFL for this. You cannot transfer the firearm to another person, but it is 100% legal to make a firearm for yourself. Where does a semi-automatic weapon even come into play here? Subby is very uninformed on firearms laws. There are no questions as to whether an FFL allows someone to teach another how to manufacture firearms. All it does is allows you to buy and sell firearms as a business. Terrible article description.

EXCELLENT IDEA!

Tannerite is a binary explosive available over the internet. Get yourself a decent rifle (even if you have to borrow it) and set the hard drive on top of a bottle of tannerite. Get back to 200 yards and fire away. Won't have a hard drive left AND you'll have had a great afternoon. For best results, remove the hard drive lid before ya do.

What was that you said? You said British Petroleum is criminally negligent?

Extremely expensive, but extremely good. As a Topographic Intel Analyst in the US Marines (our job was called Topo by us), we georeferenced images a LOT. The best tool by far is ERDAS Imagine. It's best to have source maps that are already georectified, but it's not necessary. Another tool that MAY be able to take care of this is ArcInfo. It's also an expensive suite of programs, but it also works well. As far as a service that can get the images scanned for you, you may be able to contact an architect. They frequently have large (36"-48") scanners used to scan old blueprints so they can digitize them. Buying the equipment yourself is probably cost prohibitive.

Which providers? Sounds good.

If your Windows PC(s) are all networked with your Linux PC, then just format it Ext3, share it out with Samba, and let Windows read it from over the network.

Going to be honest, never touched Vista unless I had to and I haven't yet touched Windows 7. I want to be able to do anything I want to with my OS, so WinXP was the last M$ OS I'll buy. With WindowsXP, multi-monitor support on multiple graphics cards works simply and reliably. In Linux, it works 'ok', but sometimes to get a good multi-monitor setup, it involves writing scrips to use 'xrandr' during boot up. That doesn't keep me from using Linux, far from it, but Windows does do multi-monitor support better. As stated before, I only have Windows anecdotal evidence up to WinXP.

That's incorrect. I'm a huge Linux fan, but Windows has the multi-monitor down pat. Even when cards are from different MFGRs. Intel on-board + an NVidia card will display just fine. Windows will see all of them and display all of them. In Linux, on my laptop, gnome displays them just fine, but they're the same card of course.

Honestly, it sounds like an ad that I got recently to use as an example. I'm a Fmr. Marine, so obviously I talk to a lot of my Marine buddies a lot and I'm in a few USMC groups. I do see USMC Advertisements on the site, so I have no doubt they datamined that information. Doesn't matter to me if they do it, but to each their own.

I agree wholeheartedly. I was just knocking the person before me down a notch or 2. Apparently using NFS shares is 'hacking'. I would prefer rsync by FAR over a simple NFS share. It provides redundancy as well as maintains deletions, etc.

And when the server hosting your NFS share dies, so does your entire home directory on every PC. Check and mate.