The main FB app has a serious bloatware problem. This is just the latest symptom. I was using the mobile browser but the worldwide release of FB's own Lite app made me switch. It's pretty small, requests about 4 permissions, and doesn't crash if I deny them.
Some companies, or at least their management, might appreciate a cube farm full of docks, mice, and keyboards, with no permanent seat assignments.
"By 2015, almost 70 percent of Americans were using their phones to share photos and follow news events via social media. In just two additional years, that figure has jumped to 80 percent."
The article seems to be implying that all those people are doing those things behind the wheel, but the studies linked from the article don't seem to be talking about driving at all. So basically this is an excessively wordy handwaving argument. Let's go ban everything... because it MUST be the phones.
K480 is nice but kind of bulky. K380 is more mobile.
Why is zip easier than git push?
The easiest way to regularly back up your
Have you tried office 365 in a browser?
Note how it says sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. Sounds really arbitrary. Really.
Doesn't it stand for Placebo Effect?
I think that's called Moto X. Not
Thanks for sharing your insider opinion. I appreciate that it may not be good enough from a purist point of view. But from a user perspective 5.1 is a huge improvement over 5.0. My wife had been complaining that her 2012 N7 was almost useless with 5.0.2, so I sideloaded the 5.1 OTA and it's much better now.
I hear you.
As a partial workaround you might want to try the Twilight app. I haven't tried with Lollipop but it does dim/tint the screen at night-- exact hours are configurable.
There's a long walk from "it would work with my carrier" to "I can actually buy one from my carrier."
Me too, but if the 2012 N7 performance under 5.0.2 is any indication, maybe we don't want it. (Aside from screen size, hardware specs are not so different-- 1GB RAM, 1.2ghz quad-core...) I hope they will skip us straight to 5.1. Unfortunately based on what other commenters here are saying, it still may not be good enough.
When you say the "barrier to entry is so absurdly low" you seem to mean that you could start a competing web site yourself for almost no money. And you could... but how will anyone find out you exist, and once they do, how will you convince them to buy from your site? Amazon has buying power, reputation, selection, and cheap fast delivery. They didn't get there overnight, and neither can you.
It's true that the other big names are not taking it lying down. More and more are offering shipping subscriptions, for example. But it's not so easy to convince someone to pay for multiple reduced shipping services from other sites once they have paid for Prime. You're right that there's little risk of actual monopoly though.
What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.
