Sun's Trading Symbol Going From SUNW To JAVA 356
Mortimer.CA writes "Straight from Jonathan Schwartz's weblog, Sun is changing their ticker symbol from SUNW to JAVA: 'JAVA is a technology whose value is near infinite to the internet, and a brand that's inseparably a part of Sun (and our profitability). [...] To be very clear, this isn't about changing the company name or focus — we are Sun, we are a systems company, and we will always be a derivative of the students that created us, Stanford University Network is here to stay. But we are no longer simply a workstation company, nor a company whose products can be limited by one category — and Java does a better job of capturing exactly that sentiment than any other four letter symbol.'"
Uhm. (Score:3, Insightful)
So instead of naming themselves after one product category, they're naming themselves after another. Great! The name change makes some sense (who really wants the outdated "workstation" thing attached to their name?) but marketingspeak is just so silly sometimes.
Can't help but think they'll want to do this gain once Java is no longer their flagship product. If they're still around (and I hope they are!)
It's only the stock ticker (Score:5, Insightful)
Basically, nothing to see here.
Packages (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Uhm. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The horse is dead, quit beating it. (Score:1, Insightful)
Java is one of the most popular programming languages today. It is arguably the default language for modern business applications. You may not like it, but that does mean it is doomed.
That being said, this seems like a strange move for sun. Their influence over Java is already fading, and this only makes them look more like a one trick pony that has only really made one worthwhile contribution to the IT industry.
Unfathomable. (Score:5, Insightful)
However, I do take substantial issue with one thing that Schwartz said, which I think is pretty badly thought out:
I have high regards for Sun employees in general. Their management, however, I have my doubts about.
Should APPL become IPOD? Silliness. (Score:5, Insightful)
Does anyone think that it would help Apple to change its trading symbol from APPL to IPOD?
Does AT&T worry that people will think telegraphs are old-fashioned?
GE, Apple, and AT&T are just names. For better or worse, people know what these companies are, not because of the names, but because of the companies. And the trading symbol is one step further removed.
SUN is an acronym for Stanford University Network. It should be a proud part of the company's heritage.
Wanting to fiddle with the trading symbol is a sure sign of a company that has no idea of what its identity is or what it is or should be doing. It also indicates an unhealthy focus on the stock, rather than company's business itself.
Re:The horse is dead, quit beating it. (Score:2, Insightful)
My guess is that Business loves Java because you can throw developers at a problem and be seen to be dealing with it - because there isn't a problem that cannot be solved by piling on the bodies, right?
(Confession of bias: I like Java, don't love it - it's good enough).
Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It's only the stock ticker (Score:3, Insightful)
Sun takes a strange turn... (Score:1, Insightful)
If that's the case, it's kind of incredible how much energy they spend getting everyone to try buying into a platform they know has flaws. If it were so great, they would use it themselves.
Re:It's only the stock ticker (Score:2, Insightful)