LambdaTest Reviews

Summary: Initially we had mixed feelings about trying this tool for our automation tests, however the trial period itself made us realize why investing in this tool would be worthwhile. Never knew our app was breaking in so many browsers!!

Positive: LambdaTest provides a good stack of web browsers environments to test against for running both manual and automated tests. The setup was super easy and intuitive, which is a big thumbs up! Interactive dashboard, very easy to navigate, and integration with Jira saved a lot of time. We now run multiple tests in Parallel on different combinations of browsers. So we increased our browser coverage and brought our whole pipeline to the cloud. This also improved the productivity of the team. Also the geolocation testing was a major plus for us!

Negative: Half our team uses Cypress, however it looks like the support for Cypress is not there. The tech support guys say it would be there in a few months. But let's see.

Summary: We are using the tool for cross-browser compatibility testing of both our production apps and prototypes. The UI is very neat, all features are easy to reach and intuitive, and most importantly, the feature to send issues directly to Backlog is a major time saver. We are now running all our regression test suites over LambdaTest, and we are very happy with the browser coverage we are getting.

Positive: Covers all the latest browsers and operating systems we need
Tests executed manually, offer visual appeal supported with screenshots and video recordings.
Their service is reliable , as we use automation suite for running tests throughout.

Negative: Can improve on loading time, be more quicker.
Doesn’t support native app testing .