LambdaTest Reviews

Summary: LambdaTest has the best and quickest feedback loops which scaled up our efforts for faster delivery. Because of constant global traffic on our website, the need for us to make sure our users reach our site is highly important. Therefore, LambdaTest's geolocation testing was a charm for us, its functionalities let us test on various OS and browsers through the specific area we wanted to test in their desired capabilities generator. Also, their support team was really helpful and responsive.

Positive: - Integrates with popular CI/CD and Project management tools
- Responsive support team available 24/7
- Quick updates.

Negative: We haven't faced any issues for now, its quite user friendly and up to our expectations .

Summary: LambdaTest has optimized our Selenium Testing experience to deliver a seamless user experience across every browser and device. With its cloud Selenium Grid, we were able to run our test cases concurrently across thousands of desktop and mobile browsers. It helped us to reduce our test suite's build execution time by over 10x with parallel testing. We don't need to worry about updating versions, adding devices, maintaining device sanity anymore. We have been able to easily automate and continuously run all of our test cases through the CI pipeline on LambdaTest's reliable cloud infrastructure. We even use the Lambda tunnel to test our local web apps before the final web launch. The integration with Jenkins CI helped us to accelerate and deploy our quality builds faster.

Positive: Provides effortless local testing through the Lambda Tunnel.
Share automation test reports and record videos of test sessions.
Extensive range of 2000+ real browsers and OS to test on.

Negative: Would be great if they add native application testing in their cloud ecosystem.

Summary: We serve a variety of clients across industries, thus we need to make sure our website is accessible from every desktop, mobile browser combination they use. Responsive web design is an integral part of our testing process. As a B2B, you want to make sure that your services are always a step ahead of your customers. And to achieve that, it's important to have a tool that keeps your code and web designing process in sync with the Production.

LambdaTest's variety of browsers and local testing capabilities made it a perfect fit for our requirements. Additionally we got free access to LT Browser which is absolutely loved by our developers. We are now in a better position while tackling misbehaving websites with the help of it’s inbuilt dev tools. The best part is that LambdaTest offers an automated parallel testing that helped us achieve faster and wider test coverage over multiple browsers. Its affordable price and fast technical support made the purchase decision very easy for the team. And yes I absolutely love their support staff. They are truly available for 24*7.

Positive: The support docs are easy to understand, and the product is easy to configure and get started with.
We can compare mobile website view side by side in LT Browser. Plus, we can add custom devices as well.
Geolocation testing is a plus.
Easy integration with JIRA and more project management tools.

Negative: Yet to get native app testing. But, heard somewhere, they are going to add that soon.

Summary: The organization we operate in has a broader audience. We need to ensure that our website is responsive, independent of our client's browser or operating system. To keep ahead of our clients, we needed a solution to ensure that our changes would render seamlessly when delivered to the market. LambdaTest has proved to be the go-to tool for us in our journey. When it comes to the latest desktop and mobile browsers, testing local pages, mobile responsive testing, LambdaTest excels at providing us all the features that our organization needed. With automated cross browser testing, we were able to reduce our test execution cycles at a minimal cost and via its integration with CircleCI we were able to continuously test our website every time a deployment is done. Big thanks to LambdaTest for their affordable pricing plans and supportive communication staff.

Positive: The Underpass app helps to configure local test environments instantly.
LambdaTest integrates with a variety of codeless automation and CI/CD tools like LEAPWORK, TestingWhiz, CircleCI etc.
Google lighthouse report in Automation is incredible to view performance metrics of the websites.
Very pleased with how their support staff has helped us with the issues.

Negative: As of now, the lighthouse feature in Automation is only available in macOS. Would be great if they could incorporate it in more operating systems soon.

Summary: To be honest, we were skeptical for any cloud infrastructure to serve our needs of flexibility, browser coverage and quick responses we benchmarked for our existing agile pipelines. But LambdaTest has been featureful and proactive enough to keep the confidence in their cloud infrastructure.

I have been seeing it for quite some time that they get us the latest desktop and mobile browsers to test on within two weeks and they are getting faster with it. We specifically wanted more machines with a specific browser configuration, and they quickly acted upon our request; moreover, easy integration with Monday helped us in quickly resolving the bugs encountered as we hate long mail trails.
It is been 10 months we are using LambdaTest and it took over all our testing needs faster than I expected

Positive: Stability of the platform.
Local testing app Underpass, quite a relief from unnecessary clutter of local host setup.
Up to date with latest browsers and OS like safari 14, macOS Big Sur.
Fast updates with latest browsers and good legacy browsers support.
Monday and JIRA integrations, with ability to share quick screenshots of test results and bugs.

Negative: It would be better to have more devices for screenshot testing.
Lack of mobile app testing, hope to see it soon.

Summary: Our overall test execution time for every release was very high, since we shifted to remote working. We had to find a solution that would help us radically reduce our test execution time and help us with faster deployments. Moreover our UI had multiple API dependencies which prompted us to leverage browser automation testing. By running tests in parallel on the LambdaTest platform we reduced our testing time from 50 minutes to 10 minutes. This really helped the team in getting faster feedback, in a better way using LambdaTest integrations and put more focus on code quality. .

Positive: LambdaTest solved our core challenge of reducing the test execution time further improving the feedback loop significantly. The ability to run tests in parallel on a cloud infrastructure is smooth. We could quickly and continuously execute hundreds of tests in our builds with the help of Circle CI LambdaTest integration. UI is very intuitive , features like test analytics, custom tags makes the job for my team easy to filter out tests results for the team.

Negative: There were a few stability issues while using simulators and we expressed the concern to the support team. Would be great to replace simulators with real devices for better efficiency.

Summary: LambdaTest is brilliant. The ease of testing locally hosted URLs over hundreds of browsers & operating systems without worrying about infrastructure issues has led us to deliver better softwares, faster!

Using LambdaTest Selenium Grid, we have radically reduced the manual testing effort while ensuring our web application's cross-browser compatibility. It's crucial for us (as a healthcare provider) to make sure that there are no errors. We had to incorporate a lot of changes due to COVID-19 and our in-house infrastructure plateaued the testing cycles, delaying our go-to-market. That’s where LambdaTest came to pull us through.

Leveraging LambdaTest cloud infrastructure, we could scale our automation test cycles without much of a struggle. Our automation team could execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, and the ability to test parallely helped us optimize our continuous deployment. Thanks to LambdaTest, we can find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

Positive: Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing! You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly. We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost. Support documentations are of good help to run tests parallely. Also offers integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our cycle easier.

Negative: Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this real soon. Would also like to test on real devices, and we have communicated the same to their support team.

Summary: We have been using LambdaTest for almost 6 months now. Back then, we were thinking of implementing shift left testing to catch bugs ASAP. With browser testing being one of the most rigorous and time-consuming validations, we were looking for a solution that could help us achieve continuous testing through our GitLab CI/CD pipeline. That is when we landed over a webinar of LambdaTest which demonstrated setting up GitLab CI/CD and integrating it with their cloud. We thought of giving the integration a go and it worked like a charm.

We were able to leverage the Git based triggers to execute our CI/CD pipeline. So every time a new commit was pushed from our end, the pipeline ran an automated build over the LambdaTest Grid, which allowed us to ensure our UI on every major and minor release with access to numerous browsers, platforms and devices. Integrating LambdaTest in our GitLab CI/CD pipeline allowed us to deploy quality builds faster. In the new normal where companies are forced to perform remote testing due to COVID-19, a cloud based solution like LambdaTest has been a life-saver. It gives us the flexibility to run tests from anywhere at any time without being bothered about maintaining an inhouse infrastructure.

Positive: LambdaTest Grid integrates with a variety of CI/CD tools. It provides a variety of browsers, OS, devices, all on cloud. Consistent with browser updates when new versions are released, they even provide beta versions of browsers. Affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions. Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from 5 hours when executed in parallel on multiple VM’s. This has been extremely helpful!

Negative: Their smart testing module needs improvement. We also hope they could come up with some API for automated visual regression testing. One more thing would be it would be good to see if LambdaTest can get real devices to test for mobile automation. I think these features and improvements will be a robust fix to the product.

Summary: Initially we were skeptical whether a cloud infrastructure would be able to give us the flexibility, speed and browser coverage we need for our agile sprints. But LambdaTest has been a complete value for money to us.

They usually get the latest browsers on-board under 2 weeks time and are never compromising the experience over legacy browsers at the same time. The machines are quick to load and we rely heavily over the Monday integration, it helps us share screenshots instantly among ourselves without having to be stuck in long email chains.

We have been using LambdaTest for around 8 months and it has been so far so good.

Positive: >Underpass app, very helpful for local testing on development environment
>Stability is good, downtimes are notified if any
>Up to date with latest browsers and OS like safari 14, macOS big sur
>Integrations with Monday, Jira, and more prominent tools

Negative: >Need more devices for screenshot testing .
>Would love to see mobile application testing.

Summary: LambdaTest has made our testing process less tedious with automated parallel testing. Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple hours. Parallel testing has helped us with faster feedback loops to scale up our go to market efforts.

Having a global user base we have active traffic from varied locations and testing on multiple platforms and browsers is a continuous process for the team. The feature that stands out for us is geolocation testing, all you need to do is run the capabilities and test the website for the desired location. We use Azure Pipelines for CI/CD and LambdaTest extension for Azure has helped us get a seamless testing experience for our privately hosted projects. Thanks to that we are now able to easily ensure browser compatibility for all the changes before we move them to Prod. Kudos to the team!

Positive: *Support team is very active
*Extensions to perform testing with CI/CD tools like Azure pipelines
*Offers 70+ integrations, glad to see it integrates with CircleCI and Asana
*Affordable pricing option
*Always up to date with latest browsers

Negative: *Cypress integration is missing
*Native App testing is not available yet

Summary: Using LambdaTest automation we could run all our functionality tests suits across multiple browsers and OS. Helped us identify UI misalignment specific to browsers or functionality failure due to incompatibility with a particular browser. The good part is you can automate screenshots and get insights into where and which browser your website’s UI is going off. Then we can use the live feature to identify and debug the compatibility issue. We strongly believe customer experience is the key and that could impede your product growth. With lambdatest, we could see improvements in identifying errors before our customer does.

Positive: Offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation which is amazing! You can select browsers, os, country and start testing instantly. As said we perform multiple tests for browsers coverage, so we have scaled up our testing pipeline and are now running multiple tests in parallel. This scaling up was way too easy. No more adding VMs for testing locally. Further, offers integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our cycle easier.

Negative: Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.We have been asking the support team for this feature but it's yet to be implemented. Would also like to see more devices for screenshot testing.

Summary: I use LambdaTest to validate the ui of my web app on different devices and browsers. It helps in reducing a lot of work especially around testing on multiple devices. Plus it's a handy tool for testing on devices of browsers you don't have at home.
Integration with Asana is a plus as well. Our team is using Asana as a project management tool and the integrations allow us to directly share the screenshots to Asana and even assign it to team members. Very useful for Us.

Positive: Take screenshots on multiple browsers simultaneously
All main user devices are available so you won't have to arrange or buy a device for testing.
Everything on the cloud so the whole team can work on it.

Negative: You can only use 25 browsers at a time to take screenshots. Ideal scenario would be that i can take screenshots on all browsers at once.

Summary: We use LambdaTest across our development & testing team. Our developers always perform cross browser tests on their local pages across different browsers and their versions before sending them to the testers. The integrations with 3rd party tools make it more useful. It provides a full development environment that looks very close to the real thing.
Before we started using LambdaTest, we're limited to the browsers and their versions that are available on our desktops and laptops. But now with LambdaTest, we are using Selenium grid of 2000+ browsers and their versions available on the platform.
If you want a solution to replace testing infrastructure that is hard to main and look after, LambdaTest is the best solution according to us.

Positive: Wide range of integrations.
Live and interactive testing environment.
One click bug logging.
Faster Localhost testing.

Negative: Sometimes I feel lags in a virtual machine for a very short period of time.

When using high resolutions the tests become slightly laggy.

Summary: I am a freelance web developer and own a Mac machine and therefore do not have the access of the browsers that come with a Windows OS.

But, whenever I need to test my client’s website on these browsers LambdaTest platform is where I go. Using this, I test my website across multiple browsers and their versions. I have been using this for 1 year and never got any issues.

Plus they offer amazing 24x7 chat support to help me out whenever I am stuck.

Positive: More than 2000 browsers to test on.
24x7 active chat support, I always get instant reply.
Wide range of integrations.

Negative: Sometimes, recorded video takes time to get reflected in gallery.
Sometimes, it gets slow when connecting to tunnel.

Summary: LambdaTest is used by several employees in my company. We develop websites and web apps for our clients. Our team always performs tests on local web pages before making them live, so that they could provide pixel perfect experience to the visitors. The integrations are also very useful for us. They provide integration with Jira that makes it easy for us to share the bugs directly from the dashboard.

Positive: Local page testing
Wide range of integrations
One-click bug logging

Negative: Sometimes it gets slow when connecting to the Lambda tunnel.
The recorded video takes time to get reflected in the gallery.