Fluency for Imaging Description
Fluency for Imaging is a speech-driven radiology reporting solution designed to improve efficiency, accuracy, and workflow automation in medical imaging environments. Developed by Jacobian, the platform integrates advanced speech recognition technology with AI-assisted reporting tools to support radiologists in generating high-quality diagnostic reports. Radiologists can dictate findings naturally while the system automatically structures the information into standardized report formats. Fluency for Imaging also supports the transfer of measurement data and AI findings directly from PACS systems into the report, eliminating manual data entry and reducing the risk of transcription errors. Built-in guideline support provides classification and scoring assistance using frameworks such as BI-RADS, PI-RADS, and TNM. The platform incorporates intelligent nudging and real-time feedback to help maintain report accuracy and compliance with clinical standards. Fluency for Imaging also supports ontology-based coding using standards such as RadLex, SNOMED CT, and ICD-10, enabling structured reporting and improved interoperability with hospital systems. With multimedia reporting capabilities, radiologists can include annotated images, tables, and visual elements directly within reports to enhance clarity and communication. By combining AI automation, structured reporting, and seamless system integration, Fluency for Imaging helps healthcare organizations streamline radiology workflows and improve diagnostic reporting quality.
Pricing
Integrations
Company Details
Product Details
Fluency for Imaging Features and Options
Radiology Software
Medical Imaging Software
Fluency for Imaging User Reviews
Write a Review-
Likelihood to Recommend to Others1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Terrible Date: Oct 31 2025
Summary: Extremely underwhelming and disappointing to use after the sales pitch. I would not recommend this product if you are a powerscribe user. Probably on a par with speechmagic
Positive: Good accuracy but no better than power scribe which is essentially 100% anyway.
No other pros but I have to type here.Negative: Very basic word processing. Unable to handle columns and tables very well. Very poor templates and macros compared to power scribe one. Cluttered visuals with inability to filter out other users templates.
Read More...
- Previous
- You're on page 1
- Next