Compare Adams vs. Ansys Sherlock

Adams aids engineers in analyzing the dynamics of moving components and the distribution of loads and forces across mechanical systems. Often, product manufacturers face challenges in grasping the actual performance of their systems until later stages of the design process. While mechanical, electrical, and other subsystems undergo validation in line with their specific requirements during the systems engineering phase, comprehensive testing and validation of the entire system occur too late, resulting in costly and risky rework and design modifications. As the leading and most utilized Multibody Dynamics (MBD) software globally, Adams enhances engineering productivity and lowers product development expenses by facilitating early validation of system-level designs. This allows engineers to assess and manage intricate interactions among various disciplines, such as motion, structures, actuation, and controls, ultimately leading to optimized product designs that prioritize performance, safety, and user comfort. By addressing potential issues earlier in the process, Adams empowers engineers to create more reliable and efficient products.

Ansys Sherlock stands out as the sole reliability physics-based tool for electronics design that delivers quick and precise life expectancy assessments for electronic components, boards, and systems during the initial design phases. By automating the design analysis process, Ansys Sherlock enables the rapid generation of life predictions, thus eliminating the "test-fail-fix-repeat" cycle that often hampers development. Designers can effectively model the interactions between silicon–metal layers, semiconductor packaging, printed circuit boards (PCBs), and assemblies, allowing for accurate predictions of potential failure risks stemming from thermal, mechanical, and manufacturing stresses, all prior to creating prototypes. Additionally, Sherlock's extensive libraries, which house over 500,000 components, facilitate the seamless transformation of electronic computer-aided design (ECAD) files into computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element analysis (FEA) models. Each of these models is equipped with precise geometries and material properties, ensuring that stress information is accurately conveyed for reliable predictions. This capability not only enhances design efficiency but also significantly reduces the risk of costly errors in the later stages of product development.