sllort's Journal: Fyodor Responds... Kinda

Well, Fyodor wrote a rather lengthy reponse today, collating a whole bunch of geocities pages in order to prove that any allegation made against him is false, and that he is not a terrorist.

I don't really know what to make of his response: it's weird, because he kind of denies hacking sdem's computer, but he doesn't deny posting screenshots of sdem's page to his website, and talks about "trolling trolls" and "rhetorical devices".

I honestly can't make heads or tails of it - I thought that his page on breaking into sdem's machine was a much better piece of writing on his part - but here's the link for you all to try to make sense of:

http://interviews.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=65960&cid=6080152

Interestingly he accuses me of slander and says that he would press charges if he weren't busy with an important project. That certainly would be interesting, considering I could haul at least ten witnesses into any courtroom that saw his "Troll Hunting 101" post.

Completely weird.

Good

[The Bungi]

Just wanted to let you know I've been following this with interest. You're doing a great job of exposing it, and I do believe that the slashbork "editors" are as guilty as fyodor himself.

Oh, and BTW - thanks for my .sig link =)

What does 'is' mean?

[gmhowell]

That's what Fyodor has engaged in. From my memory of the documents I looked at a week or so ago, sdem's computer was not terribly secure. By one definition, Fyodor didn't 'break' into a computer. If someone is sharing a Windows directory over their cable modem without password, am I 'breaking in' when I copy/delete all of the files I find? And argument could be made in the negative. Similarly, when Fyodor accessed sdem's computer, he was entering an unlocked door. There was no breaking and entering, just en

Re:What does 'is' mean?

[gmhowell]

You have taken the post in the manner intended.

There was a good deal of wordsmithing going on in his post

My argument, in a nutshell.

I thought the subject line, referring to the absurdity of the Clinton affair, would have indicated quite clearly the proper manner in which to read my post.