tiny69 noted that Slackware has announced 7.1 is out of beta and now officially the Real Deal. Here's the ChangeLog and a mirror. 2.2.16 Kernel, Gnome 1.2, and others. Remember back when everyone ran Slack 'cuz thats all there really was?

1010011010 asks: "Has Linux development become too political, bottlenecked and ego-driven? Witness the recent exchange between Hans Reiser, of ReiserFS fame, and Alexander Viro (VFS maintainer) on Linux-Kernel; Hans, and others, were griping about Viro refusing patches and ideas on principle, and Viro keeps telling people to shut up and read the code. It's obvious that the kernel needs better documentation and fewer penis-size contests, but it also needs better 'roadmaps' and plans -- i.e., documentation in advance of changes. Does anyone have a current "org chart" for Linux kernel development? Is Linux Kernel Development sustaintable as a coalition of little feifdoms?" Such things are concerns, but sometimes it can be that very ego that drives a project. Behind technology, there are the politics of that technology. Being human, is there any way we can avoid this? Should we?

out of control sent us a quote from Linus from the kernel dev "There's a "test2" kernel out there now, integrating most of the -ac patches, and some code that wasn't in -ac. Normally, when you integrate almost 5MB of patches, bad things happen. This time, a miracle occurred. As I uploaded the resultant kernel, a specter of the holy penguin appeared before me, and said "It is Good. It is Bugfree". As if wanting to re-assure me that yes, it really =was= the holy penguin, it finally added "Do you have any Herring?" before fading out in a puff of holy penguin-smoke. Only a faint whiff of rancid fish remains as I type in these words.. In short, not only are most of Alan's patches integrated, I have it on higher authority that the result is perfect. So if it doesn't compile for you, you must be doing something wrong. Use a mirror.

An Anonymous Coward writes: "When you are walking into a tradeshow and the first thing spoken is, 'I hear this thing is a flop,' you know you're in trouble. That about sums up my experience Friday at LINUXFest 2000. I know that there are more Linux users in the Kansas City community than this, and it would be nice to see some support. It would be nice to see a better showing Saturday, and perhaps Slashdot readers would be interested in Emmett's scheduled speech." I will be delivering a keynote, and it would be great to see you there. Admission's free. As far as the show being a flop, I'm writing a full feature on it so you can decide for yourself.

cwebster writes "Linux running on IBM Netfinity servers will be replacing Sun Enterprise 450 servers at weather.com. Sun will still have a place though, running IBM's websphere application as a back-end on Sun E4500 servers. You can read about it here at CNet." This is actually more than it sounds like, and gives a little glimpse into what IBM is thinking.

Kostya asks: "I attended a infosec seminar put on by Tripewire and eSecurity on Tuesday. They had Dr. Gene Spafford from Purdue University giving a lecture on the changing landscape of infosec; he's the director of CERIAS. In his lecture, he argued that Open Source is not the solution to making trusted systems. Trusted systems are built according to a formal specification and are tested and confirmed against a formal testing and standards process. His assertion is that Open Source systems such as Linux are developed in too chaotic a system to ever reach a trusted state. But isn't that what the Linux community prides itself on? Do you think he's right? If so, what can we do to develop more trusted systems?"

PirateBek asks: "We're considering putting in a sizable Linux box to serve our entire campus via Samba. We can save quite a bit of money by going with a fast (PIII-800) single CPU, or spending more for dual slower (PIII-667) CPUs. Is going with two slower CPUs worth the inital dough, or will a faster CPU make up for the added benefit? Does Samba tend to like dual CPUs, or does it really matter? Mind you, we're working under a tight budget, and we want to get the most bang for our buck. Any experience/knowledge in this arena would be quite appreciated."

waldoj writes: "Intel has announced their "Dot.Station," a Red Hat-powered Internet appliance. With a price around $500, I think I'll just buy an eMachine..." I wonder how much the marketroids were paid to come up with the name... the article is fairly skeptical, and I don't see enough non-vapor to know for sure.

Kidbro asks: "I'm working as a programmer stuck in a Windows environment and know a really cool coworker here who's one of the best developers I've met. He is a Windows coder, though, and today he asked me why he should develop under Linux? What makes it easier? I pointed out the big flora of tools for manipulating files and text, I pointed out the stability of the system - things I as a normal user and hobby developer on the platform think are cool. 'Yeah, but still.. that has little to do with the actual code development, it's merely some fluff beside that eases up maintenance a bit' he replied. Now, since I practically also only have developed under the Windows platform I couldn't really counter this. So I'm asking this crew here, what are the real advantages with developing under Linux?"

Several people noted that Red Hat is now partnering with Dell and offering Red Hat as one of its strategic operating systems, as well as shipping Linux web/proxy boxes to Lexus and Toyota dealerships. But thats not all... Big Blue apparently is now shipping T20 Thinkpads with Caldera and Star Office preloaded.

javac asks: "I am working at a doctor's office for the summer. With all the regulations of HMO's and PPO's and stuff we spend more time filling out forms than seeing patients. Do you know of any good software for automatically filling out forms. It should be able to connect to a database (which we already have) and completely fill out the basic info from a name or SSN. Anyway, I am sure many other business people find forms a pain too. The software doesn't have to be for Linux, but it is always a plus." I suspect that, depending on the forms involved, that this might have to be a custom application. Does anyone know of any software that's designed to assist in the completion of generic forms?

tiny69 writes: " Slackware is now in beta. The announcement is on Slackware's Homepage. You can pick it up here. The ChangeLog is here. "

Sesse writes: "XMPS 0.1.1beta is out, with experimental DivX support for Linux (by thunking to the Windows DLL). It's still buggy, but it seems to work! Sounds like good news for bringing multimedia another step away from Windows-only systems :-)" XMPS driving force Damien Chavarria has placed a screenshot on this page about the DivX support. Can anyone comment on success with this, name files successfully viewed, etc?

grimmy asks: "I've been looking around freshmeat at the floppy-Based Linux distro's, and would like some input on what fellow /. Readers think is the best one for older systems. I'm in need of a way to get a small NAT/firewall box running for my home lan with the dilemma of having very little HD space. Any recommendations would be great." [If it doesn't have to be Linux, you might find PicoBSD attractive. Does all you want, and is a doddle to reconfigure for other tasks too - nik]

njcfm writes: "Ok, you've all heard and seen embedded Linux running in all sorts of useful devices; now with the backing of Intel it can run your home network too!" The story is about UPnP ^[?] for which Intel has released a Linux toolkit.

webword writes: "The Duke of URL has posted a pretty good review of Mandrake 7.1. There is a useful list of pros and cons, along with performance and usaability ratings. There are some helpful screenshots too." BeOpen submitted a link to a 7.1 review on gnulinux.com, Sensei^ one on linuxnewbie.org, and Quick & Flupke serendipitously pointed out the new slash-like Mandrake Forum where users can (among other things) suggest features for upcoming Mandrake releases.

An anonymous reader pointed us to the Linux Bios Project which (surprise) is aiming to make a Linux Kernel BIOS. Its got numerous bugs, but some boards are booting. Interesting stuff, and has the potential to dramatically reduce boot time.

An "Anonymous" but easily identifiable person submitted a commercial about a story at LinuxPlanet about what happens when Volunteers and Commercial Developers have different goals over what is good for the Linux Community.unity and how it might affect code. The article is largely about KDE and Corel. Please keep the flame turned down on this one, as it's a critical issue that still hasn't been solved.

HerbieTMac writes: "Intel and HP are releasing HP's IA-64 emulator for Linux later this week. Particularly interesting is that this emulator will be free (as in beer) for download from Intel's and HP's Web sites."

Jens asks: "In my neighborhood I am the only one with a leased line and so I started burning Linux distributions, mostly current snapshots of the Debian GNU/Linux binary-i386 tree, on CD. I sell them for a small fee, and I sell about one to two CD sets a week. Now I realize that the GNU Public Licence permits this as long as I can guarantee that for at least three years after selling a CD I can provide a source distribution of the packages that were included on the CDs. As downloading costs money and time, mirroring an extra 3-4GB per needed snapshot is no option for me since I don't make any real money selling those snapshots. This is all very small-volume work and I do it for the fun of it and to provide people without Internet access with current Linux systems. But I'm wondering if there are other ways..." Read on...