Jan Hendrik Montag asks: "My car mechanics had problems to fix a problem in electronic motor management with my 14 yr old Audi. That was not too surprising. But as my mechanic consulted a Volkswagen/Audi-company, they received the answer, that my car is too old and they don't have the appropriate devices and software to read my cars' mind. I just wonder, what will happen in 20 or 30 years to then-vintage-cars from today? Shouldn't there be a necessity to declare old car-software and diagnostic devices open-source just to make sure a collector then can repair his/her car just as it is possible to repair an old car from the 60's? Or will those cars be doomed in case of failure? What would be a solution?"

Howpostsgetratedsuck asks: "My cable operator now offers VoIP local and long distance for one flat rate. Does anyone have any experience with or use a VoIP service provider? What are the pros and cons? What do you give up? Do they provide more than one number for my dedicated fax line? Is it better to just use wireless services for everything and dump the landline pots service altogether? Should I stay "status quo" for a while longer? I use the telephone in my business office for about 90% of my telco anyway."

BigCanOfTuna asks: "The company I work for is considering the possibility of turning over one of thier enterprise applications to the open source community. They are doing this for a number of reasons including raising thier profile in the OS community, developing relationships with other Energy companies that would be willing to hire us as consultants, and of course just for good will (if there is such a thing in business!). Since the application is very specific to a vertical market, can one expect to see the same results that other open source projects see? Are there any other successful OS projects out there that are geared to a specific niche?"

DaaZ asks: "I'm a webmaster (and more) for a small Internet company and discovered a neat feature in Symantec's Norton Antivirus 2004 that might shake some fragile nerves looking at diminished revenues outlook. This feature is an ad blocking tool that very successfully blocks banners on websites, based on a simple keyword identification. It seems to place itself between the download and render engines of Explorer (I haven't tried with other browsers yet, lack of time) and removes code based on a keyword query. We have a rotating banner code on our Web site and with ad blocking enabled, it's completely gone from the source, and so are all our images that link to an external site. It even strips images that are not advertising banners, but simply images that link to an external site! We all hate advertisements, but as with public TV, it's the reason we can get it for free (provided you buy the nice TV and the cables and the storage unit and the TiVo, and the..." Does NAV2004 have some kind of feature where certain sites can be exempt from ad blocking (in the case you do wish to support a site with ads)? I believe the choice to block banner ads belongs to the consumer, not Symantec, and it should be more than a "yes-or-no" choice. If banner ads fail, more and more sites will be forced into a pay model, and the days of the "Free Internet" will be almost over. Do you think banner ads are still an effective way to offset the cost of a website, or has their time passed? If so, what do we replace them with?

Prep asks: "We're all faced with a glut of information. Everyone where I work seems to use email as their primary means of information distribution. However, thanks in part to huge file attachments and a massive influx of spam, email delivery times are now apparently exceeding the times that our user base deems acceptable, so I've began to wonder about other means of informing users of changes to information they deem important. Ideally, the user would subscribe to various feeds (changes in their network share filesystem, various intranet webpages being updated, RSS feeds, etc) and notifications of changes to those sources would be pushed to them on an automated basis. I'm wondering if an IM based solution might not be useful here. I can't imagine this is an isolated problem, and wonder what other /.'s are doing to address it."

kaluta asks: "The Economist has a typically clear and concise story about bringing Google to the stockmarket. Basically, is it going to be the next eBay or Amazon, or will it 'simply be the next overhyped share sale to make its founders rich only to wither away miserably, either for lack of a sustainably profitable business model, or, like Netscape, because it finds itself in the path of that mighty wrecker, Microsoft?' Cool picture too."

An anonymous reader asks: "I run a small startup company who was able to turn a buck during this past year. To say 'Thank you' to the employees who put in so much time and effort to get us financially stable I would like to give them a Christmas bonus. However, I've never received one before, so what is appropriate? I have 5 employees and I want to give them all the same bonus, but while I can afford about $1500 a person, is that too much? Would gifts be more appropriate then money? What are some bonuses the Slashdot crowd has received in the past?"

Comatose51 asks: "I've been desperately trying to create an application that uses Bluetooth over the last month. I've been frustrated by the lack of good books and lack of hardware compatible with readily available Bluetooth APIs. While Microsoft added Bluetooth support into Windows XP since SP1, most hardware vendors do not use the Microsoft Bluetooth Stack. Instead, they use other proprietary stacks that costs money to obtain the SDKs and APIs for. I had to buy the Microsoft Bluetooth Mouse to get their Bluetooth Stack and a compliant adapter, which is still many times cheaper than what some companies charge for their APIs and SDKs. Java is the other (potentially better, easier) option but I haven't found any hardware vendors that state that they're Java (JSR-82) compliant. Is there really no easy way of developing Bluetooth applications for Windows? It is sad because Bluetooth holds so much promise. Thanks in advance." Might Bluetooth's problems stem from the fact that there is no consistent development platform for the technology?

AgentSmith2 asks: "I have 8 computers at my house on a LAN. I make backups of important files, but not very often. If I could create a virtual RAID by storing data on multiple disks on my network I could protect myself from the most common form on data failure - a disk crash. I am looking for a solution that will let me mount the distributed storage as a shared drive on my Windows and Linux computers. Then when data is written, it is redundantly stored on all the machines that I have designated as my virtual RAID. And if I loose one of the disks that comprise the raid, the image would automatically reconstruct itself when I add a replacement system to the virtual RAID. Basically, I'm looking to emulate the features of hi-end RAIDS, but with multiple PCs instead of multiple disks within a single RAID subsystem. Is there any existing technologies that will let me do this?"

Brad Mace asks: "Despite my hard drive's dedicated service, I'm aware that it will someday fail. I'm not really interested in burning 100 CD-Rs to backup my hard drive, so I've been looking at RAID solutions. Obviously I don't need the best or the fastest stuff out there. What would be a reasonable setup for personal use? Have people had better experiences with internal raid arrays, external raid towers, or networked storage such as Snap servers? I'm primarily interested in low price and ease of use."

IAAL asks: "I am a long-time Slashdot lurker and I have an opportunity to speak to a group of tech folks who are involved in developing software for the federal government. Can anyone point me to any good information or discussions regarding the intersection of government data rights and open-source licensing? I am doing some research now and if I come across anything of note I will submit it here."

rcpitt writes "In a discussion on the Digital Copyright (Canadian, but relevant world wide) list I subscribe to, we were discussing the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) treaty. In thinking about an article that I subsequently wrote I came up with this thought: If 'publishing' (in the context of when the copyright act takes effect for a work) were taken (by the courts for instance) to be defined only as that done without any rights management or extra contractual ties, then all works not so published would then become trade secrets (or something to that effect), and would lose (or never gain) the protection of the government via the copyright act and have to go after civil damages for individual transgressors. I'm interested in others' thoughts on this concept in light of Digital Rights Management, distribution of binary/source code (software), or music/video (multi-media) with an EULA that is restrictive might be construed as 'not publishing' in the context of whether the (insert your country) Copyright Act can be applied."

sirfunk asks: "I'm going to begin helping out maintaining the computer labs around my university campus. I was wondering what solutions the Slashdot community had hints and tips for maintaining computer lab networks. We need a solution where we can keep a remote image on a server, and the computers will update to that on bootup. We also need them to be able to update, even if Windows is severely messed up (so if Windows dies, just reboot it). I know there's commercial solutions like Deep Freeze, but I was hoping someone knew of a creative Open Source alternative. I'd love if we could run these as dumb terminals with *nix, however that won't be an option for the general public. One Idea I had was to make the machines boot into a Linux partition that would rsync a FAT filesystem (the update) and then reboot to that FAT filesystem. The whole thing about getting it to boot into Linux first and then Windows next might be tricky. I would love to hear everyone's ideas on this topic. If you have any ideas that would run cross-platform (Mac/Windows) that would be great, too."

chicagoan asks: "Last weekend I, like many other people across the US, saw Scary Movie 3. During the movie an actress gets on the web to help her in her quest. Looking closer I noticed that the Desktop environment she was using was GNOME and the Web Browser was Mozilla's Firebird. Where have you spotted actor's using Linux in movies or on TV shows?"

goatbar asks: "Being in San Diego, it is really frustrating to see the lack of information to the public about where the fires are. It seems such a simple thing to have an application where people can add info as to when and where there are fires. We would love to know when it's safe to go home, but with 3 TV stations out, it's hard to know. Seems like basic disaster service, right?"

jjshoe asks: "While access to the Internet varies greatly, depending on where you are in the USA, I recently went on the hunt for an ISP that provided me the ability to have a 'broadband' link to the Internet. I am looking for would be the ability to lease/rent static IP's, so I could host my own DNS/WWW/E-mail server. I was wondering what ISP fellow Slashdot readers use for themselves, as well as what they pay. I have gotten quotes for $50 a month for a single static IP on top of my monthly DSL fee. This seems slightly outrageous to me. Colocation is not an option as it generally runs $150 a month and does not provide me Internet access. I am open to any other ideas the community might have."

perf_monkey asks: "I'm part of a large Web Infrastructure Quality Assurance (QA) team at a large financial institution. Currently, we use Mercury Interactive's LoadRunner like a bunch of trained monkeys. We also use QA Load and SilkPerformer, but for smaller (non-J2EE) projects. As one of the technical folks, I've been trying to expand our horizons and our budget. I can no longer believe that large companies are willing to pay a QUARTER OF A MILLION dollars for the privilege of an additional 2000 Mercury VUsers. I'm looking at both commercial and open source alternatives. I've been tinkering with The Grinder and have had pleasing results. While not a full-blown QA tool, it is an excellent 'programmer's' load test tool. I was hoping that there are other tools like this and was hoping for the community's opinion. What web performance tools do you use and what do you think of them?"

Anonymous Coward asks: "My employer has recently filed a patent application for something I invented. As compensation I am being given the statutory $1 for the assignment and a shiny brass plaque if the patent(s) is awarded. Is this typical for North American companies? I did sign a no compensation and automatic assignment type employment contract and while I was willing to accept that technically, I'm owed nothing, this strikes me as cheap, greedy, and backward thinking on my employers part. I've Google'd and read and this action seems archaic, am I wrong and just full of myself? Your thoughts please!"

the_dreadnought asks: "I was just asked today which adware and spyware are the most insidious by an acquaintance. He asked me if this stuff was really legal, or was it just not important enough for law enforcement to deal with? I know the porn stuff (not from experience,,,ok, from experience) that dials out to foreign countries is one of the more extreme examples, and Gator is well known, but if Slashdot readers could describe what adware and spyware they think is the sneakiest I would appreciate it. Also, any thoughts on whether some of this stuff is even legal, as it is almost certainly not ethical."

bitkid writes "I recently run across techniques that can be used to watermark program code. While I yet have to see some source code for this to play with, the authors claim that the watermarks can be introduced into the source code and can be found in the compiled executable. My question for the slashdot-crowd is: Do you think free software (GPL or other viral licenses) should be watermarked? This could help to find GPL violations (think Everybuddy or Linksys) or can be used in court someday against the next SCO to prove authorship. What might be the ramifications of this?"