Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

+ - The McAfee Update Mess Explained->

Submitted by CWmike
CWmike writes: Wednesday was a tough day for corporate IT administrators tied to McAfee. In some cases, they faced a full-blown meltdown of their organization's PCs, as hundreds, in some cases thousands, of Windows XP computers went down after receiving a faulty antivirus update from the security firm. Who was hit and why? What happened? Short answer: McAfee screwed up, Gregg Keizer explains in his FAQ.
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:I don't get it (Score 1) 297

by countach (#31946926) Attached to: Software SSD Cache Implementation For Linux?

Because all of /bin is hardly going to be your most used stuff, and there's probably a ton of stuff frequently used that isn't in /bin, /usr.

Sure, you can try and mount your most used stuff on SSD, but that's (a) a pain in the neck to fiddle around with (b) something ideally better left to an algorithm. (c) doesn't actually work that well, since you have to divide all your most used stuff into separate file systems.

Comment: Re:Adobe also said... (Score 1) 497

by nine-times (#31946624) Attached to: Adobe Stops Development For iPhone

Sorry, but your "strawman" claim is BS. Flash is not a good thing, and I've read (and been in) many discussions where people have literally claimed that Flash is the proper way to handle video distribution because it solves *all* the problems and is fully supported on *every* platform except for iPhoneOS. And that's simply not true.

If you read my post history, or even the post that you're replying to, I've said multiple times that I disagree with Apple keeping such tight control on application distribution. As an iPhone own (first gen, before there even was an app store), I've made multiple submissions to Apple's suggestion box asking for them to allow people to install whatever applications they want. It's enough that my next phone will probably be an Android phone.

BUT! That's really not the issue here. The issue is that Adobe is astroturfing, trying subvert web standards and push Flash adoption. They're successfully getting people to argue that Flash is the epitome of what's wrong with Apple's controlling nature. It's not. This is an instance where Apple's controlling behavior is doing everyone a tremendous favor, by damaging Adobe's strangle-hold on video distribution on the web. If you want the epitome of what's wrong with Apple's controlling nature, look instead to the rejection of Google Voice from the App store.

Comment: Re:I'd pay it (Score 1) 224

by nine-times (#31946340) Attached to: Rumors of Hulu's Subscription Plans

Bigger problem than the weather: if you live in a city and rent an apartment, a lot of landlords won't let you install a dish.

As much as people say that the problem with US's telecommunications infrastructure is caused by low population density, I live in NYC and I only have a single choice in Internet or cable. There's no FIOS, no DSL, and no satellite service available. The one and only option is Time Warner Cable, and they generally stink. Still, I guess I can't complain, since a lot of people are still stuck on dialup connections.


Protecting Traditional Divorce 7

Posted by samzenpus
from the you're-just-going-to-have-to-stay-gay-married-now dept.
lee1 writes "The Texas Attorney General is determined to help protect the traditional definition of divorce, which is the dissolution of the union between a man and a woman. Therefore any gay married couples who find their way into his state had better stay married. From the article: 'Gay and lesbian couples who turn to the courts when they break up are getting mixed results across the nation. A Pennsylvania judge last month refused to divorce two women who married in Massachusetts, while New York grants such divorces even though the state doesn't allow same-sex marriage.'"

Comment: Re:A settlement is an agreement by the two parties (Score 1) 100

by timbo234 (#31919420) Attached to: RCN P2P Settlement Is Not Even a Slap On the Wrist

Try $43 billion over 10 years and even that's likely to be too high, the government is simply playing brinkmanship with Telstra so they don't try to block the plans:

And virtually all this would've been unnecessary if Telstra had been privatised properly by previous governments - ie. split into an infrastructure company and a normal ISP and phone company, not a huge monopoly.

Australia might finally get a decent competitive broadband market in 2015-2020, if we're lucky.

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.