Comment Re:All customers!!! (Score 3) 609
I didn't find any links to the actual order, though a number of organizations claimed to have a copy.
Comment Re:Ironic, but MS is right (Score 1) 474
He made it so you can access features that the terms of service clearly say cost money and is not allowed.
Wrong -- the TOS say nothing of the sort. That's really the source of this whole fiasco -- the TOS is not consistent with MS's business plan for Express. Instead of being able to point to a specific clause violation, MS has been forced to Be Evil.
Cisco Lost Rights to iPhone Trademark Last Year? 162
An anonymous reader writes "An investigation into the ongoing trademark dispute between Cisco and Apple over the name "iPhone" appears to show that Cisco does not own the mark as claimed in their recent lawsuit. This is based on publicly available information from the US Patent and Trademark office, as well as public reviews of Cisco products over the past year. The trademark was apparently abandoned in late 2005/early 2006 because Cisco was not using it."
Slashdot Top Deals
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts." -- John Wooden
