I also give instructions on setting up the same desktop in a blog post: http://certainthought.blogspot.com/2011/07/simple-linux-desktop.html
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
I've played a number of MMORPGs. I've found that most of them make grinding a part of the game. There's some strategy, but it starts to look pretty shallow about 100 missions in or so. You get stuff, but you're limited to which stuff you can use based on choices you made at the beginning of your game. The map is pretty static; nothing really changes unless the developers decide to change something on the map, and any player- or team-owned locations are more likely than not to be instances rather than part of the standard world map.
In this game, there is far less grinding for money or skill, which means that the playing can be done for other reasons; and with the corporation/alliance structures, as well as the ability to control star systems in nullsec (or lowsec, depending on how you roll), there are some definite benefits to play that won't involve grinding, but still include doing stuff.
Now, in terms of thinking, this could allow other people to intentionally, uncontrollably interrupt my thoughts without first having direct physical access to me. I don't know about you guys, but I rely heavily on continuous thought, and can't do squat with discrete thought (think long-term focus vs. multitasking). Having an interface that can interrupt my thought process by another would be a bad thing. It might not be so bad if the wire could be pulled, but if the work being done needs information pulled from remote locations, it can be a very risky proposition.
Additionally, even now, people can operate with incorrect thoughts, but they are acquired through the normal inputs and outputs, and must pass through a reason filter in order to be integrated into the mind. The idea of there being a way to bypass that filter scares me to no end; imagine someone being able to plant a suggestion, telling you to do anything they want you to do. Maybe you'd still have the presence of mind to resist stuff you wouldn't normally do, but I've done enough technical work to know that not everybody has this presence of mind, especially when threats or enticements are used ("your computer is infected, download a security upgrade to fix," vs. "You have won $1,000,000, please provide your bank information to have it transferred to your account"). Believe me, it's not just the savvy that would want such an implant.
Next, action. Our minds determine what actions we will take, even if most of the steps are handled by nerve-based autonomous processes known as reflex (you don't have to consciously think about how to walk, you just walk). If I were to be rendered unconcious, so that an attacker could make use of my body, there's no telling how law would apply; I was unconscious at the time, I performed the action, but someone else is responsible. And that's not taking into account...
The health aspects of such a thing is probably the most frightening thing about having such a device in the mind. Every part of the human body has some basic activity that can be harmful if it stopped, even for a short time. A healthy nervous system allows the proper timing signals to be received by the involuntary muscles in the body including heart, lungs, and digestive tract. Without these, neither nutrients nor oxygen would make it to the cellular tissue, especially the muscles themselves. The body would break down, eventually dying as a result.
We do have diseases, but right now, they are limited to physical infections which are localized, and usually contained and expelled by a healthy immune system (autoimmune diseases notwithstanding). Having a direct access to the brain, however, opens up the risk for a much more dangerous form of infection; imagine some really antisocial people coming up with a virus program that can alter the signals going to the heart muscles, such as, say stopping the heart, or maybe increasing the rate to even more dangerous levels. Imagine something that can force the adrenal glands to keep producing. Or perhaps stop the pancreas, inducing a state of diabetes in anyone. Or perhaps disable dopamine production, leading to a number of frightening diseases.
The point is this, if you set your brain up to be affected by computers, then it'll be just as well-protected as any computer is against attack. And unlike a computer, this cannot easily be reformatted, nor can an alternative OS be installed... at least, not without you no longer being you.
The worst Google could do to me is market out personal information. I can ignore marketing with the well-known circular file.
The worst the government can do is fine me, lock me up, make me "disappear," and/or possibly kill me in the color of justice, depending on what they find, and how they interpret it. This is especially the case if my political views are too "radical" for whoever finds them, in which case, they could use their loopholes to call me a criminal, inciter, terrorist, traitor, or any other number of names that simply mean "someone we don't like."
So, yeah, I'm more comfortable with Google knowing my information than Big Brother.
* Amtrak's purpose is to provide public transportation.
* Public transportation requires moving people about.
* Moving people about requires devices that can move themselves that people can occupy(trains).
* Devices that move themselves need power.
* Devices that move themselves need maintenance.
* Power must be generated.
* Maintenance requires staff.
* Power generators require constant resources (fuel) to generate.
* Staff are people.
* People will work if motivated.
* Survival is a motivation.
* Survival requires several resources.
* Money can be traded for generator resources.
# Therefore, money is required for power for transport devices.
* Money can be traded for survival resources.
# Therefore, money is required for maintenance staff.
# Therefore, Amtrak requires money to provide public transportation.
* Amtrak was unable to bring in enough money to provide fuel and motivation for its staff.
# Therefore, Amtrak's supply of public transportation was not constant.
* Demand for public transportation is constant.
# Therefore, Amtrak was not able to supply the amount of public transportation needed.
# Therefore, Amtrak failed on both counts.
The mainstream media has screwed this one up for years, but it's embarrassing to see hacker and cracker
The *only* people that differentiate between the two are the Slashdot crowd. To *everyone* else, an hacker is a hacker is a hacker.
First, keep in mind that the bulk of the Slashdot crowd happens to fit in the broader "hacker" category, and so would be much more aware of the distinction than the ones using the term as a blanket statement.
Second, keep in mind that times always change. To everyone else, once, geeks were geeks too. Now it tres chic to call oneself a geek when they know how to install and configure desktop applications in Windows.
Third, as times change, so do generations. I've seen enough evidence that the "hacker" label is starting to get positive connotations not to give up hope just yet... mostly because of the fact that the newer generations of people are growing up with these boxes, and are becoming familiar enough to self-apply the "hacker" label once they find out what it means; the primary "hacker is hacker" crowd are the older-school types who didn't get their first taste until the mid-90s, and the 1337 k1dd13z who refused to learn more than it took to pwnz0r a box.