Here is information to request the post be taken down.

The problem is finding out who posted your information. That will take a subpoena to get the information.

I would suggest that you get a post office box for your mail, get an unlisted phone number, delete any Facebook or MySpace account.

Remove yourself from the internet. Also do not use your name as part of your email address.

In the event Geeknet becomes aware that the security of a Site has been compromised or userâ(TM)s personally identifiable information has been disclosed to unrelated third parties as a result of external activity, including but not limited to security attacks or fraud, Geeknet reserves the right to take reasonable appropriate measures, including but not limited to, investigation and reporting, and notification to and cooperation with law enforcement authorities. In the event of a data breach, Geeknet will make reasonable efforts to notify affected individuals if Geeknet believes that there is a reasonable risk of harm to the user as a result of the breach or if notice is otherwise required by law.

If a user has comments or questions about Geeknet's privacy statement, please contact:

Email: legal@geek.net
Telephone: 1-877-Geeknet (877-433-5638)
Fax: 703-839-8611

Postal Mail:

Attn: Geeknet, Inc. Legal Services - Privacy
Geeknet, Inc.
11216 Waples Mill Road, Suite 100
Fairfax, VA 22030

  Geeknet complies with the U.S. â" E.U. Safe Harbor framework and the U.S. - Swiss Safe Harbor framework as set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce regarding the collection, use, and retention of data from the European Union and Switzerland respectively. Information regarding the both the E.U. and Swiss Safe Harbor Frameworks can be found at : http://export.gov/safeharbor

  If you have questions or concerns regarding this Policy, you should first contact legal@geek.net Filing a complaint in English will expedite the process. Geeknet will investigate and attempt to resolve complaints regarding use and disclosure of personally identifiable information in accordance with the principles contained in this Privacy Statement.

If contacting us does not resolve your complaint, you may raise your complaint with TRUSTe by Internet at http://www.truste.org/consumers/watchdog_complaint.php, by mail at WatchDog Complaints, TRUSTe, 55 Second Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA 94105, by phone at 415-520-3400, or by fax at 415-520-3420. If you are mailing TRUSTe to lodge a complaint, you must include the following information: the name of company, the alleged privacy violation, your contact information, and whether you would like the particulars of your complaint shared with the company. For information about TRUSTe or the operation of TRUSTe's dispute resolution process, see http://www.truste.org/consumers/watchdog_complaint.php or request this information from TRUSTe at any of the addresses listed above. The TRUSTe dispute resolution process shall be conducted in English.

We get requests from media for victims; if you are interested in talking to media at a later date, please contact me for additional information.

Wilma

wilma@idtheftcenter.org
Identity Theft Resource Center
Toll Free: 888-400-5530 ext 103
Fax: 858-693-4974

ITRC is a nonprofit organization that specializes in identity theft. The information above is based on ITRC's research and experience with the crime of identity theft and is not intended as legal advice. This email may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waiver any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.

California law requires that stalking, including internet stalking, includes a credible threat. The definition of "credible threat" may include, but is not limited to, written or vocal threat of bodily harm. Another form of credible threat is illegally compiling personally identifiable information about another person without explicit written right--as is obtained for the pupose of employment applications--to do so. I have a right to record my personally identifiable information online. You do not have a right to retain that information for your own purposes to wave it around when convenient for entertainment, or in this case stalking and antagonization, purposes.

The online antagonists have demonstrated that they have retained and compiled, for illegal use, personally identifiable information about me.

California law requires that stalking, including internet stalking, includes a credible threat. The definition of "credible threat" may include, but is not limited to, written or vocal threat of bodily harm. Another form of credible threat is illegally compiling personally identifiable information about another person without explicit written right--as is obtained for the pupose of employment applications--to do so. I have a right to record my personally identifiable information online. You do not have a right to retain that information for your own purposes to wave it around when convenient for entertainment, or in this case stalking and antagonization, purposes.

The online antagonists have demonstrated that they have retained and compiled, for illegal use, personally identifiable information about me.

California law requires that stalking, including internet stalking, includes a credible threat. The definition of "credible threat" may include, but is not limited to, written or vocal threat of bodily harm. Another form of credible threat is illegally compiling personally identifiable information about another person without explicit written right--as is obtained for the pupose of employment applications--to do so. I have a right to record my personally identifiable information online. You do not have a right to retain that information for your own purposes to wave it around when convenient for entertainment, or in this case stalking and antagonization, purposes.

The online antagonists have demonstrated that they have retained and compiled, for illegal use, personally identifiable information about me.

Are d'jou a trust fund baby? Do d'jou need spending cash?

Do d'jou have a microphone (such as is common for foreign language students to sample the language in the wild--ie. eavesdrop in public)?
Are d'jou skilled at talking crap and disturbing people?
Does it give d'jou a thrill to watch people become angry?
Are d'jou interested in a career as a mimic?
Do d'jou like to play pretend stakeout and spy on people?
Do d'jou think it would be funny to swarm, slam, or mob on people?

I pay trust fund babies just like d'jou to do just that.

As I told Jacob: "Show up right here, right now to get paid."

I will change your name.

I employ a thousand trust fund babies, uglier and stupider than you, to play pretend stakeout, swarm, slam, mob, mimic, antagonize, and aggravate people.

You too could get a piece of what d'jou deserve.

Show up right here, right now to get paid.

Trust fund babies have a right to earn lunch money. That's equal opportunity employment.

Today is Thursday the tenth day of May in 2012 A.D., the day of the grace and peace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit; the day of the salvation, redemption, providence, and blessing of the almighty Lord God Most High. If not today then what other day is there?

Nobody in the world knows the conceptual meaning of,"damned if you do, damned if you don't" more than men who are fathers to girls. When a female reaches that distinguished age when she is beginning to think about close physical interactions with a male more than simply sitting on a lap and moving back and forth because it feels funny; who do you suppose she feels most comfortable exploring her close physical interactions with?

"Daddy! If you won't do it then I am going to find a boy who will!"

Daddy is damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't. If he does then he will not only need to face his little girl in all of the upcoming public situations--and act normal--but he will also be required to act normal and weather all of those situations which involve any sort of discussion of child pornography. Such situations are often a polling court for the group to set upon any member who acts in any part guilty of not telling something to the group. The whole function of society makes the concept of child pornography somewhat of a joke; since the discussions often demonize the very same behavior which Daddy had to choose upon "Daddy! If you won't do it then I will find a boy who will!" If Daddy didn't do what his little girl wanted to do then he will suffer the wrath of his little girl; who will happily expose each and every little infraction or perceived fault or shortcoming to the entire world in her quest for revenge. Often enough the surrounding situation was planned by Mommy and, in either outcome of the encounter with the daughter, Mommy is waiting with all of the stops to torment and torture Daddy. A very obvious indication that Mommy is setting Daddy up for the trap involves,"You two take a quick bath while I am gone" (knowing that the little girl is beginning to wonder about gender) and then, upon her return, that knowing wink and comment,"Did you two have a good time while I was at the store?"

Daddy is always damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. The little girl is always going to reach a point in her life when she wants to have closer physical interactions and explore various fits and sizes. Daddy is always going to be the boy who is closest to knowing how to make these things happen.

Similar events occur on the opposite side of the gender line--but that's usually because Mommy is a functioning human, too. And, yes, women like sex, and they love sex, but just like any other human they do not like to do it on command, and they do not like being told how to do it, and since they routinely have twenty or thirty orgasms daily ("he's my main squeeze"), when they reach an environment to actually participate in sex with a male they are mostly thinking only about getting the finish coat and redeeming it for the credit to their gumby account. So, in the case of son with Mom, son is usually going about his own business and perhaps thinking about closer physical interactions but rarely is son going to bully up to Mom the way Mom teaches daughter to bully up to Daddy. Usually the son-Mom occasion occurs because that's one of the few times when Mom actually feels like doing it (life having beaten her into the wretched and angry state where sex only occurs for the purpose of getting males to do what the women want or leading a male into a situation which is planned to result in his partial or full demise--e.g. Herodius with John Saul Paul the rich young ruler scribe Baptist convert to Christianity) and Mom happened to catch son when she was sure that he was thinking about it. Liken the situation to breastfeeding inside the box (of sin): the baby only wants more when Mommy is having a good day (or, if Mommy is having a bad day, then having her nipples licked for hours is sometimes a good stress reliever).

I have you on record talking sh*t for six years. I have you on record trying to start something for six years. C'mon motherf*cker, right now. Right now motherf*cker, let's go. Step up momma's boy. Put down your battery operated push-button nipple, step out from behind your Mommy's dress, and let's do this.

The world of social heirarchies, jobs, careers, and positions is nothing but talking sh*t. When an employee begins to indicate to their manager that the employee considers the manager to be talking sh*t then standard policy is to isolate the employee and make something bad happen to them. That's what money is good for. People will talk sh*t all day long while they have a few dollars. Isolation and deprivation is the standard control technique exercised by those who have "more" or have access to control over the supply chain to others.

I don't need your money. I am not waiting to get back into your fucked up system. I am not trying to please or appeal to anybody. I consider your entire world to be absolutely so much talking shit.

I have you on record talking shit from behind your mommy's money dress for six years, ten years, fifteen years. That's all you do--talk shit and talk shit and talk shit and, if you are ever challenged, then you turn off that faucet flow of money or begin adding on those "accidents" which cost people money. Step up, momma's boy. Let's go, little miss priss. You're never going to get anywhere in life making stupid sounds with your mouth all the time. Put down the battery operated nipple, step out from behind your wallet, and let's fight right now.

Girls do this to each other beginning in first, second, third grade or so--usually a fifth or sixth grade girl sets upon a younger one,"C'mon, bitch, you think you're so hot. Pick a fight. Don't just stand there and make stupid sound with your mouth. Don't just wave your finger around. You want a boy? You think your pussy is so good? You think you're so hot? How are you gonna handle a boy if you can't even handle this? Pick a fight, bitch. *push*"

You are nothing but talking shit.

Today is Wednesday the ninth day of May in 2012 A.D., the day of the grace and peace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit; the day of the salvation, redemption, providence, and blessing of the almighty Lord God Most High. If not today then what other day is there?

An important goal of language is likened to a popularity contest; a highly evolved situation. A primitive popularity contest features one person competing against another person with a group of people voting. The individuals under consideration are discrete, the event of voting is discrete, the voting method is discrete, the tally of the votes is discrete, the identity of the judges is discrete, and the declaration of the victor is discrete. Factor in several thousand years of debate, issues, considerations, mix-n-match, increase the number of candidates, increase the number of voters, increase the number of judges, increase the frequency of the voting events, increase the frequency of the contests; consider how two discrete popularity contests could be conducted at the same time in different areas located within small walking distance of one another, consider how three contests could be conducted simultaneously with voters drifting between events, consider how two contests could be conducted within the same geograpic area. Consider how a large number of popularity contests could be conducted in only negligably marked and separated areas all located within a common geographic region. Language is the mechanism which allows an enormous array of popularity contests to operate within a common locale while collecting ballots, tallying votes, declaring victors, and acquiring participants for upcoming contests all at the same time on a constantly updating schedule which allows for cancellations, substitutions, and amendments to decisions. Language is itself a popularity contest. In east Asian cultures, in ancient times, the popularity contest was a scheduled courtyard meditational practice involving hundreds or even thousands of people at a time: the judge stood in front of the organized crowd and held up two cards on which were printed lingual symbols. "Say this!" holding up one card,"or say this!" holding up the other card. The monks and acolytes then had entire yearly schedules counting the cards, tallying the votes, tracking and organizing and breaking down the data sets; analyzing the results sequentially, over the course of the day, depending upon the weather, and any number of other factors and considerations and scheduling updates possible within such a system. Modern day western culture includes the format of the Christian mass as a method for observing and reporting the state of the language popularity contest.

Over the course of time some sounds are preserved in key positions; the environmental considerations which surround the consideratino of a "key position" is even more complex than the considerations for the popularity contests which surround those key positions. In the primitive form examples of key positions are the beginning of the event of voting, the end of the event of voting, the beginning of the process of tally, the end of the process of tally, the event of declaration of the victor. The system becomes complexified as the popularity contests begin running concomittantly and in tandem and the exact location and characteristics of the "key position" become ambiguated but, mathematically, not at all lost or made less important.

The lingual popularity contest is a microscale accumulation of "good" and "bad"--the heart of the "say this, or say this" courtyard exercise. The individual's decision of one over the other is designated to be "good" vs. "bad" and the monks and acolytes managing the tally system are carefully tracking what the population perceives to be "good" and "bad" sounds. "Good" sounds are collected and experimented using intergender interactions. "Bad" sounds are collected and tested using warfare and political oppression. The system of musical chairs operates, more or less, for the same purpose and allows for slightly more real time update and modification.

"Politics", over the course of the day by the end of the year, is a "bad" sound--involving oneself in linguistics which originate on "politics" will, unless the individual is supported and protected, lead to finger pointing, blame, and aggression. In the consideration of an animal form, "ass" is similarly "bad"--the source of embarassment, a responsibility which presents an opportunity for the surrounding people to attack when the individual is disrobed and often with their legs constricted at the knees, bad odors, sounds which attract ridicule and scorn, and the accumulation of unsightly excess cellulite if an individual does not practice rather extreme personal dietary maintenance. An "emissary" is sent "out". According to the interface between self and environment (epidermal and dermal layers), the difference between "in" and "out" is "hair" and "sweat" (according to the follicle). Sweat is sent out (out/ud), hair grows from the inside (in). The "shroud of turin" is "something out of tour in", a tour is a period of time spent drying out (in the consideration of a religious pilgrimage as a tour), and the "shroud of turin" becomes "something sweat and dry hair" (of/and, prepositions often interchanged upon translational considerations) and "shro" then nearly defines itself as "ass".

Political is bad or shro. Emissary is out or ud. A scout, based upon lingual analysis of the construct, is "sco ut" or, more or less, the same as "shro ud". "Sco ut" becomes "bad out", "bad out" becomes "political emissary". A scout is a political emissary--humorous transposition of this could be that a scout is a butt hair.

The concept of matching lingual constructs depends not necessarily any single sound, not necessarily any single syllable, not necessaryily any single letter--but the overall running of the system which works as the mechanism by which single popularity contests may be integrated into a constantly running constantly updating system of popularity contests. Observe that mathematical integration is coneptually similar: a running function is provided with the intent to calculate all of the form area between the running function and the established axis (in higher mathematics even the nature of the axis may be defined by increasingly complex functions). The practice of observing and reporting the state of the running system of popularity contests is not new; the formal community collection which allows the population to recalibrate itself approximating the "say this, or say this" method gave rise to the practice of Christian mass long before B.C. turns into A.D.

Salons and studios are the business units which conduct an exercise related to the mass. The mass attempts to profile and practice the current state of the popularity contest of sounds. Salons and studios are a system to determine which sounds and constructs may be waxing to popular ("good") or waning to disdain ("bad"). An entire segment of the population devotes its money merely to creating new names for vaporous business units--a salon or a studio. Through whatever mechanism the level of popularity of that name alone is determined to be rising or falling--business cards distributed, lists given to trail participants, free giveaways; anything which could possible use human interest to generate tangible measurements of popularity. Lingual constructs determined to be waning or bad are privately tracked to use as lingual intimidation tactics. Names and constructs determined to be waxing to good may be provided with actual physical floor or office space. The wealthy segment of the population managing the system pays enormous wages to their sons, daughters, cousins, friends, favorites, etc. to do nothing more than staff the space and give an impression of a functioning business; though, at this point, the name still has no real product. The staffed office space involves itself primarily in a promotional charade: staff the space, invite groups of people in for interviews, give essentially pointless presentations (though the list of "good" vs. "bad" sounds could be experimented on the invitees), and have people "spread the word" and hand out business cards. Answer telephones: telephone calls do not always reference the business name, wrong numbers, odd requests, mistaken identities. The purpose is to tally the state of the feedback based upon nothing more than a business unit with floor space and bodies moving in and out and around. If the feedback begins to request a particular product then perhaps that is the product which the name, the lingual construct, should make. Distribute some product, continue to answer telephone calls, wait and observe if interest waxes or wanes. Repeat the process, make adjustments, continue to monitor feedback and requests from individuals not formally involved with the official staffing of the floor space and, if interest happens to blossom into something profitable, then perhaps that name may be given as a favor to some servant who has merited an increase to be an assistment manager of a business unit.

Successful businesses do not happen. They are planned to happen or planned to fail because the people who run salons and studios have been cooking telephone books for a long time. The internet page ranking system, and the big boom of advertising dollars spent on page ranks, and the business units which failed or flopped because they lost on page rankings--that was all contrived. It was a dance. It was a setup. That entire system, those years around 2005 when advertising and page ranking was big money, when entire segments of the IT sector of the stock market were refactored and projected according to metrics which arose from page ranking and internet advertising agencies--that was all inside works, it was a facade, nothing but a scam. That entire system of Google vs. other internet crawlers and aggregators and search engines--the people running the studios and salons, paying enormous dollars to their own progeny to do more or less nothing, have already been through all of the machinations to cheat everyone else and obfuscate the winnings because they did it with studios and salons since before the telephone lines were installed, and then again when the phone lines were installed, and then again when the phone book became a public publication, and then again when the internet boomed. The studio and salon system is a hack on top of the weekly congregational mass; another fine tuning of the public popularity contest of language.

The covenant of circumcision, for the priestly class, had nothing to do with genitalia mutilation. The covenant of circumcision was related to "now that this hot coal has touched your lips"; a test for the practice of learning to correctly operate the musculature of the respiratory system, sinuses, and facial region during the pronunciation of sounds. A person who endeavors to maximize their performance within the running public popularity contest of linguistics needs to know how to interact with the reporting systems as well as perform in the social situations of daily life--and this requires that the individual is able to perform the sounds properly. The systematic standardization of the formation of "proper" sounds vs. "improper" sounds is assessed through the priestsly covenant of circumcision--see the biblical book of "Acts of the Apostles", chapter fifteen, for a semidramatic situation involving a consideration of the importance of forming sounds according to the proper standards.

Today is Thursday the third day of May in 2012 A.D., the day of the grace and peace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit; the day of the salvation, redemption, providence, and blessing of the almighty Lord God Most High. If not today then what other day is there?

Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed. Sodom and Gomorrah were made into near autonomous private communities. Perhaps they were designed to be propagating systems or perhaps things just turned out that way due to the nature of life and the human being form. The nature of life is to propagate and, should an entire group of human beings manage to coordinate a system of ritual and maintenance tasks which completely fills the days weeks and years, then life has found a very favorable method for accomplishing the thermodynamic goal of all of the underlying systems of chemistry and physics: to increase entropy and move energy. The consideration of entropy in thermodynamic balance equations is always philosophical. Any system, in physical chemistry, which appears to increase entropy is always playing a part in what appears to be a static field if considered on a much larger scale; such as is magnified through the comparison between modelling cellular aerobic reactions and the trajectory of planets revolving in a solar system. The entropy of the aerobic reactions in the bottom of the ocean of the planet are absolutely nothing compared to the numbers involved with throwing entire planets around stars yet, in their own way, people will become involved in endless and generations long evolving debates over whose particular method of approximating aerobic reactions is most mathematically correct. Without concentrating too much on allegorical representations of these systems return thought to the consideration of Sodom and Gomorrah: nature has evolved a system of wet amino acid protein and enzymatic heterogonous mixtures layered into human organs and systems and, for the purpose of increasing thermodynamic entropy in progressively smaller physical boxes and systems, that works out well for the balance of energy in all of the heat and energy transfer between spaces. If nature did not evolve this way then the events of reactions in this space would be largely static--and static does not work out well for the entropy of balanced equations. Static is mostly uniformly distributed and that is a minimal change in entropy.

Without concentrating too much on the systems which produced Sodom and Gomorrah. Without concentrating too much on the systems of operation within Sodom and Gomorrah. Without too much consideration given to historical, scriptural, religious, or philosophical aspects give concentration to the mathematical existence that Sodom and Gomorrah may or may not have been designed to be propagating cities but, because the nature of entropy is to destroy all patterns for increase until the destruction reaches static and then to begin progressively destroying patterns on a larger scale, Sodom and Gomorrah became propagating systems. In the field of computer science this represents the evolution of kernels designed to run primarily on standalone workstations into operating system kernels that, even if installed on standalone workstations, are aware that there may be several thousand other workstations expecting to pass data through its memory registers. Computer software written for standalone workstations allocates memory on a very small scale: setting variables, perhaps the creation of arrays for the performance of sequential iterative tasks. In many cases programming has evolved to allow that sequential iterative tasks may be computationally rearranged into any form required. This is a joke behind moving partitions around, dynamically linked libraries, and memory management--there's always another layer of hardware between you and the physical location of the hard drive platter, the processor, and the SIMM module. Hard drives are constantly reshuffling sectors, many library functions are constantly running in the processor if you only know where they are, and memory locations are constantly being moved and swapped and mirrored. Standalone programs do not create variables just for the purpose of creating variables and then leave them unused: some compilers will fail the user if variables or entire arrays are created or never used; functions defined but never filled. Network aware kernels, on the other hand, leave entire megabytes available to buffers which might be filled, or to functions that may be requested, or to cycle timings for wires which may be connected at some point in the future with or without the knowledge of the user at a standalone workstation. The network aware kernel does not even know the format of the field or the electromagnetic properties of anything contained within those entire blocks which remain open--that is true raw data. If something inside of that raw data happens to match a cycle timing from a subsystem--the libraries constantly running within the processor--those will be executed at that level.

Sodom and Gomorrah were cities which imitated the function of a network aware kernel. Overpopulation was managed to a single body depending upon the nature of various systems running within the city and, at the same time, any body which was sent forth from the city contained the full programming necessary to perform tasks which would create a largely similar system all over again including the functions necessary to establish communications and interdependencies with other available cities. The system was also designed to determine the ultimate superiority of a single city through the destruction of the other cities with the consideration, as in a network aware kernel, that there may be thousands of other cities. Sodom and Gomorrah were designed to be systems of controlled death because they were designed by people who were establishing superiority between masters and servants.

Without concentrating too much on religious, scriptural, or historical aspects.

Within Sodom of Gomorrah there are not simply people doing things; accomplishing tasks. Those people are, at the same time, avoiding disaster. Operating system kernels are often accomplishing more than one task even if the author(s) is/are not aware of the functions; hard drives are always shuffling sectors, hardware subsystems are always running libraries, memory is constantly being swapped and shuffled. The hardware makers do this to avoid burnout in the the hardware by constantly distributing the applied magnetic fields over the entirety of the recording surface. No longer is the renegade hacker going to manage to forkbomb the write head and burn a physical hole in the disk which may be used to read a null field into the raw data of the enormous blocks of open fields in the network aware kernel and then have a running program use that block, which was expected to be a signal but is now an enormous sucking field of null, as a variable in a program to send to the process checking uid. People are always multitasking--nature is designed to increase entropy. Sodom and Gomorrah were a city of metaphorical falling anvils and runaway freight trains. If the people inside were not in proper compliance with their designed role then they just may be under the anvil or on the tracks--and the city was designed to clean up any disaster and adjust the population demands accordingly. The city could withstand a depletion because the city planners knew that anvils and freight trains were at work; they planned those events.

Today's culture is the mathematical expansion of the network aware kernels of Sodom and Gomorrah. People who deviate from their assigned roles are not immediately hit with an anvil or train but are progressively subjected to deprivation and aggravation in alternating cycles of starvation and overabundance of all the wrong items. In this fashion they will return to the normal function of the city. Today's culture, like the network aware kernel, is not scheduled in absolute lockstep but allows for blocks of time of which format the kernel has no real concept because the contents will be handled by a subsystem; the kernel is only there to move, mirror, swap, page, combine, factor, resize, or apply some function to the entire segment and then allow it to be used by a program whose author may or may not be in contact with the kernel author. An individual leaving Sodom or Gomorrah has, running within their DNA, all of the subsystems necessary to reestablish the original city if a proper environment should be found: their task is to remain alive and iterate through all of the progressions necessary. Within Sodom or Gomorrah the people operate because they applied for the position, tested into it, and are operating with the psychological expectation that their earnings will allow them to appease their masters of debt. Outside of the city the individual is yet trained to observe the monetary system of debt--either for people being expelled due to overpopulation or people leaving at the end of the contracted position. When Sodom and Gomorrah were closed into private communities they continued to operate in that manner and individuals leaving the city, continuing to operate within the network aware financial system of the surrounding world, became the most dominant figures of the historical records.

The cities are designed as death traps, however, because they were designed to be controlled operations. Without concentrating too much on the existence of who those masters of control are or whether or not they have survived. Allow that whatever society existed outside of the city and whatever culture existed inside the city were two financially aware systems. The city itself is designed as a death trap. Individuals leaving the city are trained to perform tasks to reestablish a system approximating the city and reestablished approximate cities are designed to include the ability to interoperate with each other (as death traps) and communicate and interoperate with the original city (a death trap).

The death trap runs on a fourteen step sequence (stations of the cross)--steps may be repeated and additional steps included as necessary. The fourteen step sequence may be applied as often as scheduling allows or scheduled to occur over a period of time. Multiple fourteen step sequences to accomplish concommittant goals may be scheduled for any individual. Each step in the fourteen step sequence was originally designed to fit the format of a service (day of atonement) and various other rituals (in the pentateuch) were established which lent themselves specifically to some or others of the sequence. The yearly calendar of the law of Moses represents events which occur as a result of the mathematical practice of the rituals (based upon the training of those individuals leaving the city) or the practice of those individuals at their level of function within the overall running death trap.

7:42.

Please demonstrate all of the mean, spiteful, hateful methods which you use to execute your grudge against others. Please demonstrate the language and the character of posts which would be used to stalk another individual across the internet. Include the rationalizations and justifications which you use to convince yourself of your superiority due to your possession of "more".

*IMPORTANT* If possible please include URLs for other areas and message boards on the internet where you have similarly pursued people to continue your grudge. Include the names and identities of other individuals whom you have ridiculed and antagonized for the purpose of destroying their online persona, their personal identity, and for the ruination of their career and social life.

For the purpose of a lawsuit to be executed against you in the future time when suitable interest is generated and representation is made available, please demonstrate the method for abusing and intimidating an individual using the internet.

Legal representation is actively sought for the purpose of finalizing a solution and legal judgement over the individuals who participate in the on-and-offline stalking routine. In my opinion the situation should be treated similar to domestic violence in most localities: no interaction or effort should need to be included from me for the officiating authorities (ie. district attorney) to pursue a case against the aggressor individuals. I have established my own personal mode of conduct through the day and have no historical interest in the individuals who have taken it upon themselves to harass and mock me daily for their own personal entertainment or whatever other purposes. I do not seek any personal gain or retribution (though, after six years and the inclusion of the surrounding offline locality in their inspired hatred, along with the subjecting of my person to all of the attacks which accompany defamation and gossip) and truly wish only that the individuals who devote themselves to employing illegal methods for destroying the reputation and accomplishments of others be properly dealt with according to the federal, state, and local laws.

Why have authorities not already taken the necessary and called for actions? Multiple reasons: local investigative authorities (San Diego police) were misled due to a combination of rumors and gossip (inspired by the online antagonists) and perpetuated by wealthy members of the local community and were predisposed to consider me guilty by default due to my homeless status (this problem has been mostly remedied over time), local legal authorities (attorneys) have personal bias with regard to my opinions and writings, and federal investigative authorities (FBI) have personal bias with respect to my appreciation for marijuana.

I know, honey, you have _more_, and I should do what you say to have _any_, because you are the people who control _more_, and everyone should be focused on getting _more_. Blast away on me with your _more_, and tell me how you have _more_, and tell me all of the things you get to do because you have _more_, and show me all of your dirty, mean, nasty tricks that you are able to get away with because you have _more_, and tell me just how much you enjoy being mean and spiteful and nasty to me because you have _more_, and you will always have _more_, and I will never get any unless I do what you say because you are the people who have _more_.

Yes, pookie. Blast away on me with your _more_. Just let yourself go and slam into me and unload on me with your _more_. I know, your life hurts, and things aren't perfect, and it makes you feel better. Just let go of your humanity and give me everything you have and let me know that you will always have _more_.

Don't forget to visit the wiki and come up with _more_ ways to hate me because you have _more_.

Today is Wednesday the eighteenth day of April in 2012 A.D., the day of the grace and peace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit; the day of the salvation, redemption, providence, and blessing of the almighty Lord God Most High. If not today then what other day is there?

Consider the trial of an adultress in Torah (the wikipedia page claims "nor is its existence acknowledged elsewhere in the Bible"--why do you suppose Jesus was drawing in the dirt?). Does she sound belligerent and demanding (fat and drunk)? According to Torah standards the entirety of modern society sounds fat and drunk--especially when using their cellular telephone.

Consider Norman Bates in the Hollywood movie Psycho. "Mother," said Norman plaintively,"the Lord said that it isn't good to keep a list of things to hate." "Norman," screamed back his mother derisively,"the Lord told me to tell you that you will not get any more of this until you learn to do what you are told." Does she sound belligerent and demanding?

There is no winning for you in that society: perhaps some measure of life with a few bright and happy spots, but the only final outcome is a bitter, lonely, frustrated, disappointed, and spiteful death. You are so fat that most of your gravity is in the well (gravity well: what do you have which is not now in sight?); you are so drunk (on money, power, whatever) that you make noise to pick a fight (with those whom you hate--for whatever excuse).

How to help yourself.

Observe the self section of the book. Assessment, maintenance, and the systems to practice while participating in all forms of prayer; lingual and practicing. Accept that the world of jobs, possessions, earnings, investments and property is coordinated and maintained by people whose sole focal point of life is to maintain and pursue a list of hates; there is no winning that situation and there is no way to peacably make your way through life in that environment. The choice which the Lord provides is clear: to live by faith, endure hardship, and remain in life; or, to choose to acquiesce to servility for a chance (whatever a "chance" is) to have whatever portion may be earned from the people whose sole focal point of life is to maintain and pursue a list of hates and thereby become involved in the physical, emotional, and psychological situations which lead to death. "If you sound fat and drunk then you shouldn't be here."

How to help me.

Nobody is going to starve to death--it is nigh physically impossible. Especially with the function of the toilet mob within the surrounding society, dominated by the people of hate, food is best taken in form and measure which is known to produce brick solid output. Especially when living in metabolic fast, and having developed a lifestyle which subsists on hardly ten thousand calories weekly, my body does not even keep a measure of bile remaining in the digestive tract and larger quantities of food provide diminishing benefits (and semi-formless results). Establishing a home is an expensive and dangerous venture in this world and few people are able to provide any real assistance towards meeting that outcome. On a day by day basis the most effective method to assist me is to provide quality marijuana.