Comment: No visas? (Score 1) 332
Comment: Re:Bad summary: the airline, not the government (Score 4, Insightful) 624
Comment: Re:One Outrage I agree on... (Score 1) 489
Actually, the *entire* rail thing is a fucking joke. It's ridiculously expensive and isn't all that fast. It does have to, you know, make plenty of stops. It's essentially more corporate welfare for specific companies. Americans like to talk about "high speed bullet trains", because it makes them feel all sophisticated and European, but they have no fucking clue what's really supposedly so great about it.
Our *current* rail system does suck, which is the entire point of building a new high-speed rail system. We like to talk about it because if it actually ever happens, it will be better than flying for a lot of domestic travel: more legroom, power outlets, not having to show up 2 hours before departure, the ability to use mobile data plans for the majority of the trip, etc.
Comment: Re:What grounds? (Score 2, Insightful) 973
Comment: Re:Google Wave not dead yet (Score 4, Funny) 123
Google Wave isn't dead
It's pining for the fjords.
Comment: Re:I Did What They Told Me To! (Score 1) 218
I logged back on to Facebook and Zuckerberg had killed my farmer and was raping my livestock
probably in the year
*ear
Comment: Re:Yeah it's a toy. (Score 1) 460
and notified my extended family of several cute things the kids said.
I'm pretty sure that falls into the "what I had for breakfast" category...
Comment: Re:I found the 'defective by design' aspect (Score 1) 311
spoiling the ship for tuppence of tar short sightedness
Are you some sort of bot that just randomly puts words together?
Comment: Will this keep out Adobe's crap? (Score 1) 265
Comment: Re:Solar Power (Score 1) 240
Comment: Re:They are NOT Denying Global Warming (Score 3, Insightful) 1100
I hate to resort to calling the EPA malicious, because I want to believe that they think that what they are doing is right, but, seriously, that's the only alternative. They certainly aren't trying to _actually_ clean up the air, since worse offenders than the USA already exist and won't be affected by this law at all.
Come the fuck on. You cannot honestly believe that the US government, which depends on tax revenue from American businesses and their employees, would intentionally handicap said businesses? To what end? Stop trying to turn a legitimate difference of opinion into some sort of battle between good and evil.
As far as the "worse offenders" go, the EPA doesn't exactly have jurisdiction over other countries, so it's a moot point. You're presenting an imaginary alternative -- that the EPA could somehow regulate greenhouse gases in China, India, etc. -- as some sort of evidence that this is only intended to bankrupt the EPA's revenue stream? Get a grip.
Comment: Re:Decriminalization in Light of the Drug War (Score 1) 640
Comment: Re:Splenectomy Patients (Score 1) 257
Comment: Re:The Small cell telcos did it to themselves (Score 1) 300
VZ and AT&T helped to invest in new phones by giving money to Apple and RIM in exchange for exclusive agreements.We're now in a market cycle where people want a good phone that can do everything since coverage is about the same everywhere.Sprint and T-Mobile are screwed because they cater to bottom feeders and now they're complaining. they want the new phones without paying to develop them.
Huh? Where is Sprint complaining? They still get exclusives, and the people complaining are consumer advocates and government anti-trust regulators.
Sprint's answer was to fund the Pre which is still in beta. no wonder no one was allowed to see it before launch.
Yes, and that's why Apple kept the iPhone a secret too, right? In the real world -- beyond your conspiracy theories -- consumers are getting screwed and complaining, and at least someone in government is listening. This has nothing to do with how well Sprint or T-Mobile is doing or who their customers are.